Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I want every lurking freeper to read this

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
rumguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 12:48 PM
Original message
I want every lurking freeper to read this
And then I want them to choke on it...

"They should also have looked up some testimony by Dick Cheney, the first President Bush's secretary of defense (and now vice president), three days later, boasting of similar slashings before the Senate Armed Services Committee:

'Overall, since I've been Secretary, we will have taken the five-year defense program down by well over $300 billion. That's the peace dividend. … And now we're adding to that another $50 billion … of so-called peace dividend.'

Cheney proceeded to lay into the then-Democratically controlled Congress for refusing to cut more weapons systems.

'Congress has let me cancel a few programs. But you've squabbled and sometimes bickered and horse-traded and ended up forcing me to spend money on weapons that don't fill a vital need in these times of tight budgets and new requirements. … You've directed me to buy more M-1s, F-14s, and F-16s—all great systems … but we have enough of them.'"

snip

"Another bit of dishonesty is RNC Chairman Ed Gillespie's claim, at a news conference today, that in 1995, Kerry voted to cut $1.5 billion from the intelligence budget. John Pike, who runs the invaluable globalsecurity.org Web site, told me what that cut was about: The Air Force's National Reconnaissance Office had appropriated that much money to operate a spy satellite that, as things turned out, it never launched. So the Senate passed an amendment rescinding the money—not to cancel a program, but to get a refund on a program that the NRO had canceled. Kerry voted for the amendment, as did a majority of his colleagues."

http://slate.msn.com/id/2096127
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
arcane1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. but, but, but... that's DIFFERENT
Cheney is a Republican, they do no wrong!

:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ima_sinnic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
2. waste of time, freepers can't read
... but, seriously, that is a good find. yes, let the dumb little Bush-ass kissers choke on their distortions of Kerry's record. nobody's buying their lies anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PragMantisT Donating Member (893 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
3. Are you assuming Freepers can read?
Don't be silly!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
4. Amazing, isn't it, that the LIBERAL media isn't all over their FRAUD?
Edited on Thu May-13-04 12:59 PM by redqueen
I mean, really... the NYT is just soooooooooo liberal. Shame that the liberal Times reporters don't seem to think such cynical disingenuousness is worth looking into.

Anyone that believes the media is 'liberal' is a grade-a MORON.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. I've decided that people who think that
the media is liberal HAVE NO IDEA what liberals think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redleg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. You got that right.
The assholes around here (the Cincinnati area) write about the "lib'rul media" in most of their letters to the editor in the Cincy Enquirer. I get so fucking sick of hearing how any time Bush looks bad it's because of the media and not because of Bush's stupidity and recklessness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zookeeper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. In Mpls. - St. Paul also....
Edited on Thu May-13-04 10:52 PM by Zookeeper
Nearly everday the Mpls. Star Tribune prints a letter attacking them for "attacking" Bush. "Attacking," to the freepers, means reporting anything that isn't head-in-the-sand supportive of BushCo. It would be comical if it wasn't so relentless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arwalden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-04 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. You're So Right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jus_the_facts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-04 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #4
16. the term 'liberal media'......
Edited on Fri May-14-04 11:13 AM by jus_the_facts
.....it's used first and foremost in referrence to all the immoral...*sex and violence* used in t.v. and movies by fundie repukes...most don't remember it's initial use as a political tool by FDR but only how it was used to SLANDER poor NIXSON...since the media has been monopolized by the right and has been so blatantly partisan in recent years has it become such an insult to us on the left...but IMO its use stems from the IMMORAL...UNCHRISTIAN depravatiy in TV programs and movies instead of politics....we're back to media monopolies and disinformation ala Citizen Kane!!! :evilfrown:

on edit....this is an observation I've made from havin' to be related to southern baptists :freak:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
denverbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
5. Don't expect that to change anything.
One of our local talk radio morons continually claims Kerry doesn't support the troops in Iraq because he voted against the $87 billion to fund the war.

Now Kerry repeatedly said at the time he wanted to vote for an alternative plan, which would have forced Congress to actually pay for the war rather than borrow to pay for it.

No matter that people continually tell this moron WHY Kerry voted the way he did. That doesn't matter. Cause this asswipe can truthfully proclaim that Kerry voted against funding for the troops and let it go at that.

Now nobody in their right mind believes that Kerry would've let the soldiers suffer from lack of supplies or not get paid, but Kerry never got the chance to prove that, because the funding was approved and the troops were never in any danger. But freepers aren't in their right mind, or at minimum, they choose not to be in their right mind.

That's why you should nominate governors, not Senators. Senators vote on 1000's of things. 90% of their votes don't even matter. If John Kerry voted on a tax package which cut incomes to 0% but raised cigarette taxes a nickel, freepers could proclaim he voted for a tax increase. If he voted for the same bill once in committee, once on the floor, they could claim he voted for taxes increases twice. If that billed failed to pass, it doesn't matter. He still voted for two tax increases. That's where pukies will come up with their 'truthful' ads proclaiming Kerry voted to increase your taxes 1000 times, and voted to cut 1000 defense programs.

The nice thing about governors is they only voted for final approval or disapproval. They have no votes on intermediate bills and bills that never make it out of committee.

It's no accident that no sitting Senator has won the Presidency since JFK.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rumguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
6. freepers suck!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IrateCitizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
8. The sad thing is, at that time, on this issue...
... Cheney was RIGHT, and the Democratically-controlled Congress was WRONG.

There's a reason that Eisenhower really wanted to call it the Military-Industrial-Congressional Complex... because Congress counts on it for pork to ensure incumbent re-election.

If we're going to point out the hypocrisy of the other side (which is quite rank), we need to also see the times that we have been wrong as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gruenemann Donating Member (753 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-04 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #8
17. If Eisenhower were speaking today, do you think
he might call it the military-industrial-media complex?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mandate My Ass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
9. Cheney's weapons' slashing
Edited on Thu May-13-04 04:01 PM by Monica_L
Cheney also provoked the longest, most expensive lawsuit in the history of the USA when he chopped the Osprey and the F-15(IIRC) from production without giving them a day's notice. Just went in and told them to clear out, no check is in the mail.

This suit went on from the time he began as SOD and lasted until 2002 IIRC.

These weapons were and are expensive boondoggles that will likely kill more servicepeople than the enemy could ever hope to, but his high-handedness was uncalled for and quite costly.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rumguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
10. I hate freepers!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigbillhaywood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 10:41 PM
Response to Original message
12. This would make for a great negative ad against Cheney/Bush. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arwalden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
13. Kick!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC