Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Tommy Friedman sees need for Regime Change here

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-04 11:39 PM
Original message
Tommy Friedman sees need for Regime Change here
Bushie now has lost whore Friedman as well. Tommy finally figures out that Roveian politics rules this WH over his dream of a democratic ME.

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/05/13/opinion/13FRIE.html?hp

It is time to ask this question: Do we have any chance of succeeding at regime change in Iraq without regime change here at home?

"Hey, Friedman, why are you bringing politics into this all of a sudden? You're the guy who always said that producing a decent outcome in Iraq was of such overriding importance to the country that it had to be kept above politics."

Yes, that's true. I still believe that. My mistake was thinking that the Bush team believed it, too. I thought the administration would have to do the right things in Iraq — from prewar planning and putting in enough troops to dismissing the secretary of defense for incompetence — because surely this was the most important thing for the president and the country. But I was wrong. There is something even more important to the Bush crowd than getting Iraq right, and that's getting re-elected and staying loyal to the conservative base to do so. It has always been more important for the Bush folks to defeat liberals at home than Baathists abroad. That's why they spent more time studying U.S. polls than Iraqi history. That is why, I'll bet, Karl Rove has had more sway over this war than Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs Bill Burns. Mr. Burns knew only what would play in the Middle East. Mr. Rove knew what would play in the Middle West.

I admit, I'm a little slow. Because I tried to think about something as deadly serious as Iraq, and the post- 9/11 world, in a nonpartisan fashion — as Joe Biden, John McCain and Dick Lugar did — I assumed the Bush officials were doing the same. I was wrong. They were always so slow to change course because confronting their mistakes didn't just involve confronting reality, but their own politics.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
madmax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-04 11:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. If condi reads this to bush he'll have fit.
Sound like he's lost Friedman. :bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rumguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-04 11:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. You're a day late and a dollar short Tommy-baby
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bpilgrim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-04 11:46 PM
Response to Original message
3. wow
he sounds like a DU'er :evilgrin:

peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NWHarkness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-04 11:51 PM
Response to Original message
4. What a putz
He just now figured out what we've all been saying for years.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mayberry Machiavelli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-04 11:53 PM
Response to Original message
5. I welcome all RW wingnuts coming off that reservation. Even if I doubt
the sincerity.

Each one makes it easier for the next one, as well as for the wingnut voters who may not have been paying close attention, but have a "vague sense that things aren't going that well."

Addressing the responsibility of the people like Friedman in getting us all into this mess can wait until after November.

Tucker Carlson apparently saying Iraq war a mistake today (I didn't see it).

George Will just hanging by a thread, implying that shrubco might not deserve to govern, but not coming out and saying exactly that.

Friedman off the reservation. Let the beat go on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbaraann Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-04 11:53 PM
Response to Original message
6. Jesus.
IT ISN'T POLITICS YOU IDIOT TOM FRIEDMAN; IT'S FASCISM!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-04 11:54 PM
Response to Original message
7. I dislike Friedman as much as the next person, but why
Edited on Wed May-12-04 11:54 PM by Eric J in MN
I dislike Friedman as much as the next person, but why demean Thomas by calling him "Tommy?"

It's unnecessary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Miss Authoritiva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-04 11:56 PM
Response to Original message
8. The unbearable lightness of being wrong
Okay, is Friedman displaying real balls or fake balls? Only time will tell. He admits that he's "a little slow." Well, now he's resorting to understatement.

"There is something even more important to the Bush crowd than getting Iraq right, and that's getting re-elected and staying loyal to the conservative base to do so."

If Friedman -- a featured columnist in one of the world's leading newspapers -- really just figured that out he should seriously reconsider his job options.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-04 11:56 PM
Response to Original message
9. The Unbearableness of Being Tom Friedman (Rall)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 12:03 AM
Response to Original message
10. A thousand dead soldiers, tens of thousands dead civilians
And Friedman apparently thinks "Oops, my bad" covers it. What sort of infantile intellect do you have to have to think that the Bush administration is "above" politics? Everything this corrupt administration has done, from day one, has been with one eye on the polls.

In my mind's eye, I see Friedman clapping so that Tinkerbell won't die.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 12:08 AM
Response to Original message
11. Weak fucking tea Tommy
Your own paper told the story about Rumsfeld sending Tommy Franks back to the drawing board time and again because his troops and logistic projections were outside the bounds of "lean and mean." You saw what happened to Shinseki for daring to hold fast to real world assessments. Josh Marshall interviewed the core neocons in the summer of 92 and revealed that they neither planned for outcomes other than flowers and hossanahs, or cared a whit if Iraq sunk into chaos. You tried to elbow yourself some latitude in case the venture headed south with your idiotic "real reason", "right reason", "moral reason", and "stated reason" buffet of excuses for the war (on the days when your high dudgeon wasn't making you declare France our enemy -- enemy! -- for having the temerity to pass on the Bushco koolaid).

Your "I was fooled!" tripe is a stinking pile of shit. No one fooled you, and you ain't fooling no one. Asshole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
submerged99 Donating Member (299 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 12:21 AM
Response to Original message
12. Maybe we'll see a battle of Neo-con "pundits"
Brooks and Sullivan are teetering on the edge and now Friedman has went overboard. It's good to see these smug, arrogant, "pundits" having to deal with the consequences of their war mongering. I hope that we see a internecine battle of neo-con pundits as the "true believers" denounce their allies as traitors. Entertaining fireworks to come, I believe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 12:25 AM
Response to Original message
13. Will the last media whore please turn on the lights on the way out.
Thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kaitykaity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 12:27 AM
Response to Original message
14. It takes a set to admit you're wrong in public.
Glad to see Friedman has had the Kool Aid antidote. Hopefully
he's the first of many.

This is good news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 01:15 AM
Response to Reply #14
19. yes, Friedman deserves some credit
Friedman shouldn't be praised to the sky for finally figuring the Bush isn't moral (so long after the rest of us).


However, at least he admitted he'd been wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kaitykaity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 01:53 AM
Response to Reply #19
24. I can't wait for his next NewsHour
appearance. All the other ones have made me want
to gag. (That is if he isn't barred from the show
for falling of the Bush bandwagon.)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
minkyboodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 12:29 AM
Response to Original message
15. like rats fleeing a sinking ship
these guys never cease to amaze me.
Scott
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stopbush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 12:42 AM
Response to Original message
16. What a pathetic dunderbutt!
He's just like bush! He shares no blame! Bush led him astray...Tommy was dead serious, how could he know they weren't?...etc.

You were a willing and KNOWING Likudnik enabler, Friedman.

Fuck you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orwell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 01:10 AM
Response to Original message
17. I'm Sure
Why don't you tell the tens of thousands of families who have had their lives blown apart at the end of your terrible swift sword that you "made a mistake."

I'm sure they would understand. I'm sure.

O
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 01:12 AM
Response to Original message
18. That essay raised my opinion of Thomas Friedman.
That essay raised my opinion of Thomas Friedman.

At least temporarily.

I still don't like him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 01:22 AM
Response to Reply #18
22. Yes, he hit all the big points
He took all the major activities and pointed out the correct political reasons Bush did what he did.

If Tom could only have used this gift when it mattered, before we got into the mess we are in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWizardOfMudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 01:15 AM
Response to Original message
20. I'm holding out for Tommy Franks
But I think he is a little too christianity pleated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 01:19 AM
Response to Original message
21. Fuck you MR Give War a Chance Freidman...really fuck you
too little too late..at least 20,000 lives too late if not more. We all knew he was a completely political incompetent ass prior to the first bomb dropping...how could your vision from inside the beltway have been more clouded than ours?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
I_like_chicken Donating Member (341 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 01:22 AM
Response to Original message
23. Friedman is a douche
but if he wants to come to our side, ill take him. Its better late then never, right??:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlemingsGhost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 01:59 AM
Response to Original message
25. Tom, you're a whore. And we will not forget...
Edited on Thu May-13-04 02:04 AM by DemsUnite
That goes for all of the cheerleading presstitutes.

(on edit: typo)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC