Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Wow! A tough article and a tough headline about General Miller. NYTimes!!!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
frank frankly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-04 10:07 PM
Original message
Wow! A tough article and a tough headline about General Miller. NYTimes!!!
Read this and tell me if you agree that this is a big article...

I think the NYTimes just connected some big dots! This is good reporting!

The tide is turning. Once the media decides to tell the truth, BushCo is DONE. Maybe this is why Rummy is still hinting at leaving?

-------------------------------

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/05/13/politics/13MILL.html?hp=&pagewanted=print&position=

General Took Guantánamo Rules to Iraq for Handling of Prisoners
By TIM GOLDEN and ERIC SCHMITT

<snip>

According to information from a classified interview with the senior military intelligence officer at Abu Ghraib prison, General Miller's recommendations prompted a shift in the interrogation and detention procedures there. Military intelligence officers were given greater authority in the prison, and military police guards were asked to help gather information about the detainees.

Whether those changes contributed to the abuse of prisoners that grew horrifically more serious last fall is now at the center of the widening prison scandal.

General Miller's recommendations were based in large part on his command of the detention camp in Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, where he won praise from the Pentagon for improving the flow of intelligence from terrorist suspects and prisoners of the Afghanistan war.

In Iraq, General Miller's team gave officers at the prisons copies of the procedures that had been developed at Guantánamo to interrogate and punish the prisoners, according to the officer who traveled with him. Computer specialists and intelligence analysts explained the systems they had used in Cuba to process information and report it back to the United States.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-04 10:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. Regardless of claims to the contrary, the Gitmo prisoners ARE
covered under the Geneva Conventions. Ignoring those treaties that the United States is a signatory too amounts to high crimes committed by members of this administration, not to mention being crimes against humanity.

Men were hung by the neck until dead for this same shit in the late forties.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frank frankly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-04 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. but do you agree that this article significantly pushes the blame upwards
if the NYTimes or WaPost mentions Rummy's "Operation Manhunter" by name, then BushCo is done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-04 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Yep. You got that right.
It'll be a cold day in hell though before I start singing the praises of the NYT. They helped get us into this quagmire. Tom Friedman should be flipping burgers, not writing his claptrap warmongering rubbish. and David Brook? In what puports to be a quality paper?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frank frankly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-04 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. dude, i got nothing but digust and fury towards the NYTimes
but we gotta work with the media we have.

i've been watching them closely for two years now, and been reading here and dailyhowler.com and mediawhoresonline.com.

i know the nytimes is Pravda on the Hudson.

but we will need them to change to truly get out of this.

i think this was a good article. will it lead to move? i hope so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-04 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. Didn't mean to jump ya.
I know what you are saying and you are right. Just hacks me off to watch them do their warmongering and now tiptoe back pretending to be respectable journalists "covering a story".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frank frankly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 06:58 AM
Response to Reply #13
20. no problem, Jacobin
no offense taken at all!

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PfcHammer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-04 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Bastard Brooks needs a glow stick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-04 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
4. Hmmm. Story seems to be going up the chain!
I have always questioned how BushCo could just say that people in some chosen catagories were not subject to the Geneva Accords. I thought that meant we were ignoring the treaty.

I wonder just how loyal Gem. Miller is the the admin?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frank frankly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-04 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. if he is anything like that reptile neocon from the Senate Tagulba hearing
then he won't peep.

but if the press simply does its job, then it will go right to rummy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scottxyz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-04 10:35 PM
Response to Original message
8. This story involves violence, murder - and "sex" (rape)
Edited on Wed May-12-04 11:20 PM by scottxyz
This is the type of story that the American public loves to read for months on end.

So maybe the media will decide to turn on Bush now that they feel they can make some money pushing a sex-and-violence story.

Whatever pays the bills.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frank frankly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-04 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. i think you are right. sweet jeebus...
but you are also right when you say"whatever pays the bills".

our media is stoopid and soulless. how stupid!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scottxyz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-04 10:40 PM
Response to Original message
10. What I keep coming back to is this whole phoney notion of "interrogating"
Edited on Wed May-12-04 10:41 PM by scottxyz
We already know that there were no WMDs. Everyone knows we're either there to "create democracy" (the official line) or steal the oil (the unofficial line).

So what's the need for detaining and torturing "insurgents" anyways?

I've heard about 70 to 90 percent of them hadn't even done anything to get arrested. Some got turned in by neighbors who had grudges against them.

Iraq didn't do 9/11, and they didn't have WMDs, and they didn't have uranium from Niger. We got Saddam. So why are we rounding up Iraqis and interrogating and torturing them now?

They put a harness on some old Iraqi lady and rode her around like a donkey. What the hell was that supposed to accomplish? Was she supposed to yell out "The 50,000 tons of nerve-gas is stored in such-and-such"?

Torturing old ladies. Bush and Rumsfeld are SICKOS.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-04 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #10
18. It's an Inquisition - not an interrogation
With kOmmAndeR AWOL Smirky as the Grand High Inquisitor, bound on a Crusade of power and greed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bpilgrim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-04 10:40 PM
Response to Original message
11. i think the pros gave these PUKES enough rope to HANG themselves
the 'CONTRACTORS' is the giveaway... this goes RIGHT to the TOP.

peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frank frankly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-04 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. is this the CIA's way of pulling the plug on BushCo?
could be!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bpilgrim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-04 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. yep
and that the media is ON this thread spells BIG TROUBLE for this admin.

my boss is a staunch republican (rino) but almost every day brings up another gripe about this admin.

when this story first broke a republican aquaintence of mine of was pro bush, pro war, basically a real ditto head - like frankens - and also a former MP - GW1, recently out of the reserves - but when we met that weekend by chance i was very curious to hear his reaction to this when as soon as i got within earshot he asked me if i had heard about it...

when i said yeah, he said he was really shocked and appalded by the story. knowing his background, i thought i'd lay off any typical snide remarks about the chimp since i figured he'd just see it as a cheap-shot he being a dittohead and all... but while i was searching for the right words to give him my take on the situation he kept filling them in for me LIIIIEEEEEEEESSSSSS.

this admin is in deep dodo. i live in the HEART of a very conservative state and it no one i know can defend them anymore.

i think the patriots and defenders of OUR constitution and OUR way of life will prevail in the end... it's a simple NUMBERS game there are just waaaaay more of us then them ;->

:hi:

peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frank frankly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-04 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. I see it, too. And I hear it. Even the most hatrioc folks are scared now.
Check out CatWoman's thread on this:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x1589575

Her title: "I can't believe this. The RW's message isn't taking root"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DUreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-04 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
14. A sad world where a factual headline can be called tough
I agree it is hard hitting for the nyt not to whore a headline, but

they have betrayed so frequently that I immediateley suspect that

they are still whoring for bushinc* and that miller has been assigned the part of 'fall guy'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frank frankly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-04 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. that could be. but they have survived by getting away with EVERYTHING
even if this is as high as it goes, it is 90% better than anything the NYTimes has given us during this crisis, Krugman notwithstanding.

Factual headlines are hard hitting...yeah, i know it's fucked up, but it is a clear improvement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sundancekid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 06:46 AM
Response to Reply #15
19. I agree totally with you, FRANKLY ... the worm is turning for *b/co
... and wait, until the NYT connects the dots that the "evangelical" Major Boykin was the one advising Miller on military INTERQUISITION (as I call it) at Gitmo!

Even the non-scientific internet media whore polls show that the public is NOT about to forget about the abuse scandal -- the Berg horror not withstanding -- and the media smells blood in the water on that one too.

By all means, let's PUT TRUTH FIRST, for a CHANGE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC