Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Lindsey Graham is an awesome liar and HYPOCRITE.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 11:44 AM
Original message
Lindsey Graham is an awesome liar and HYPOCRITE.
http://www.coffeeshoptimes.com/graham.html

The above link is to a transcript of Graham's inept work as a member of the Judiciary Committee during the impeachment mess. In it, he tries to imply that Charley Rangel was "spun" by the WH to besmirch ML's character in the media, a suspicion Graham got from using his wild imagination while reading tabloid stories to feed his endless fascination with Clinton's penis.

Don't let one day of decency fool you into thinking Graham is a manof sterling character. He's a phoney and a HYPOCRITE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rumguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
1. I see that guy and I think - snake oil saleman
There's something about him that gives me the creeps...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kaitykaity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
2. Bigger picture.
He's a Republican who is openly critical of Bush.
That is a rare breed indeed, an endangered species.
We have laws that protect endangered species.

So what if that species is a slimy butt worm?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scrotim Donating Member (171 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. i agree; but note that graham's criticism of bush is muted and falls far
short of calls for reprimand or impeachment.

perhaps he's playing gop "bad cop" to take some of the pressure off?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kaitykaity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. The Bush Thugs take people out when they do
Edited on Tue May-11-04 12:02 PM by kaitykaity
shit like this. Maybe the Bush Thugs are afraid of
Senator Graham because he's a sleaze who knows where
the soft spots are?

We need Republicans like Graham if we are ever going
to be able to hold the Bush Thugs accountable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. I suspect he is reading the writing on the wall
Edited on Tue May-11-04 11:58 AM by BurtWorm
and wants to survive without being smeared by the Bushist brush. That's probably the very best one could expect of HYPOCRITICAL slime like Graham. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soundfury Donating Member (280 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
4. He talks a GREAT game but he just spin.N/T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
5. American politcs journal
has the best name for him. "Clinton crotch sniffer Graham"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
7. Sorry, im the one that started the complementary thread
:spank:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. It just needed counter balance.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. I was just plain DECEIVED
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soundfury Donating Member (280 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
10. Lindsey and McCain are just playing the good cops
Edited on Tue May-11-04 12:02 PM by soundfury
for Repugs now, donÕt trust either one of these fuckers.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quinnox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
11. I agree and it is bothersome to see him being praised at DU
Edited on Tue May-11-04 12:01 PM by quinnox
He is a typical hard right winger, and he is just playing politics with this in order to enhance his political status, that is all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frances Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
12. Graham was very smooth
and was convincing me that he was trying to get at the bottom of things -- until he said that Rumsfeld should not be held responsibile.

If Clinton deserved impeachment for consensual sex with a legal adult, then Rumsfeld deserves to be held accountable for what happened on his watch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
14. He also claims to be a Gulf War Veteran....
..even though he was in the reserves in the USA during the entire escapade....

He's a bullshit artist...just like the rest of the gop scumbags...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Are you serious?!
Not that it surprises me he'd be lying about his military career. He's also a notorious faker about his down-home con-try boy imij.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShaneGR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
16. I don't get it
He has taken MANY positions on this matter in line with McCain, he's been very outspoken about the seriousness of the issue. So you attack him over Clinton's impeachment? Move on man, we need Repub allies on this stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. We don't need them to the point that we forget what shit they pulled
Edited on Tue May-11-04 12:22 PM by BurtWorm
in the past! Two weeks of okay behavior and he's suddenly "decent" and "awesome?" No way. He's got a lot more to do to make up for the damage he's done in the past. A LOT!

PS: What are these "allies" going to do for us, anyway?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kaitykaity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. I always use the analogy of the two
Republicans who went into Nixon's office at the end
and said, "Mr. President, it's time for you to go," or
something to that effect.

When one of us says wat Sen. Graham says, it is ignored
as partisan sniping. Having a partisan on the other side
say the same things give us an incredible boost in
credibility. For example, the media pays attention when
Rep. Murtha, a long-time hawk, says that the Iraq war is
unwinnable.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Nonsense! The facts give us credibility!
Not Lindsey Graham. There is no comparison between Graham's stance on Abu Ghraib and Lowell Weicker's, for example, on Watergate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kaitykaity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. Listen for a second.
Please?

We want people on the OTHER SIDE to agree with us. The
only way we can be rid of the Bush Criminals is for some
honorable people on the OTHER SIDE to agree with us. If
someone the OTHER SIDE respects, like LG, agrees with
us, then the OTHER SIDE will listen to them, and we are
one step closer to winning.

Get it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. Lindsey Graham is not honorable.
His past behavior has shown that. But if his position on Abu Ghraib helps get the upper ups who ordered the "prisoner softening" or set the conditions for this kind of treatment of prisoners in Iraq, Guantanamo, etc., then I'll concede he may be of some use. Until then, he's the same schmuck he ever was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kaitykaity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. And I'll concede that he is not honorable.
But thank you. "He is of use to us." That's all
that matters to me right now. We need every bit of
ammunition we can get.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. Is he aiding and abetting this movement to settle Abu Ghraib on
this limited number of troops and their commanders? Is he aiding and abetting the closure of investigation above that level? If so, he's of less use to "us"--to the truth, really--than some overly forgiving Democrats are making him seem to be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kaitykaity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. I saw a program where the reporter rode along
with him on the way to the Rumsfeld Senate hearings,
and he came away unsatisfied. It was truly remarkable.
Also, that question he asked in the hearing about keeping
this to a few enlisted personnel got my attention big
time.

This report is why I'm sort of willing to look at LG as
potentially useful. (It was on Nightline, I think,
Friday night. I don't have a link. :shrug:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blindpig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
20. he's the kind of hypocrite that southerns love to elect
Edited on Tue May-11-04 12:30 PM by blindpig
If you have any doubts slide over to the SC state forum and see what he's up to: cavorting with Rev Moon!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
26. Ah, this is the refreshing truth
I didn't dare feed the absurd posts that proclaimed him an honorary Democrat and a saint. He's got some circular game in this, I'm completely certain of it. The aim is to bury the soldiers and cut accountability off before it reaches the upper level of command. Before it reaches in to the cabinet and Executive office. Watch his every move. I wouldn't give him the mantle of reformer just because he echoes some obvious facts. Watch as he pushes the administration line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC