Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

check out Jay Selulow (religious right lawyer) on POTUS rights

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
bobbieinok Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-04 06:47 PM
Original message
check out Jay Selulow (religious right lawyer) on POTUS rights
This is the organization and lawyer supported by Pat Robertson.

They started with school/religion issues.

See web page, and don't you like the 'cute' play on the ACLU?

ACLJ: Supreme Court Must Permit the President to Act as Commander-In-Chief in War on Terror - Not Federal Judiciary
April 28, 2004

(Washington, DC) - The American Center for Law and Justice, which specializes in constitutional law, said today the U.S. Supreme Court has an important opportunity - in the cases of Yaser Hamdi and Jose Padilla - to permit the President - in his constitutional role as Commander-in-Chief - to lead the nation in the war on terrorism - including taking action necessary to hold U.S. citizens as enemy combatants, which are not subject to the jurisdiction of U.S. courts.

"The constitutional authority vested in the President as Commander-in-Chief is clear - the only question is will the Supreme Court uphold the Presidential authority or usurp it and give to the federal judiciary," said Jay Sekulow, Chief Counsel of the ACLJ, who attended oral arguments today in the Hamdi and Padilla cases and filed amicus briefs in support of the government's position with the high court. "The war on terrorism is unique and ongoing. And while there are many battlegrounds - including our own country - the operational decisions cannot be subject to the jurisdiction of hundreds of federal judges across the nation. Such a remedy would not only violate the constitution, but would create confusion and chaos. To give enemy combatants access to the U.S. court system would undercut our ability to gather intelligence information to protect Americans from future attacks."

...

The ACLJ brief in the Hamdi case contends that "enemy belligerents are detained, not based on probable cause or other important domestic constitutional principles, but because of their armed belligerency, capture, and continuing threat to American interests. Their detention, therefore, is preventive rather than punitive."

mpre....




http://www.aclj.org/news/pressreleases/040428_sc_terror.asp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ikojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-04 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. Not really related but Jay Sekulow was born Jewish but
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 05:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC