Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

black box voting The RECORD Act in the Senate

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-27-04 11:12 AM
Original message
black box voting The RECORD Act in the Senate
For people who want electronic voting machines to print paper balltots, there is a new bill in the Senate we can support.

"The RECORD Act of 2004," bill number S.2313, requires paper ballots. It states that paper ballots are the official record of election results.

It is similar to another good bill, "The Voter Confidence Act," bill number S.1980.

But The Record Act has more cosponsors, and I encourage activiists to support "The Record Act" in the Senate for that reason.

Cosponsors include Hillary Clinton (NY) and Barbara Boxer (CA), who previously introduced other bills on this subject. Other cosponsors of the RECORD Act include Charles Schumer (NY), Ernest Hollings (SC), Frank Lautenberg (NJ), and Blanche Lincoln (AR).

If you don't live in New York or Florida, where both Senators are already cosponsors, please ask your Senators to become cosponsors.

Dial 1-800-839-5276 (Capital Switchboard) and ask to be transferred to the office of one of your Senators.

Then you could say, for example, "I'd liike to leave a message for the Senator to please cosponsor "The RECORD Act," bill number S. 2313, to improve the accuracy of our elections."

By the way, if you are unfamilliar with why many people want electronic voting machines to print paper balltots, the concern is that if the machines count the votes wrong, there will be now way to do a meaningful recount, without paper ballots.

http://www.moveleft.com/moveleft_essay_2004_04_26_the_record_act.asp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-27-04 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
1. I don't know why this bill is better than Graham's
Until I understand exactly how it's different (besides just having more co-sponsors) then I won't support it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 05:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC