If there was any justice in the world, Fr. John would be re-appointed to the bishopric he was denied last time.
For those who don't follow it, Jeffrey John is not exactly the "lightning rod" that Gene Robinson was. For one thing, although gay, he's not partnered, and committed to living a celibate life. He has also said (in the past -- his opinion may well have changed after what happened in the last couple of years) that he doesn't advocate allowing the ordination of non-celibate gays and lesbians.
Nonetheless, and despite the fact that he should have been the ideal "credit to his sexual orientation"

gay bishop from the conservative point of view, his election as Bishop of Reading prompted an unbelievably huge outcry from traditionalists in England and elsewhere, each claiming that, should he be consecrated, schism would result. Although he "officially" declined the appointment as bishop, inside sources told that he was essentially ordered to refuse by the Archbishop of Canterbury (ostensibly a liberal, but who has been doing a great impression of a pink-tutu since taking office

), against his will, and that he was personally devastated by being made to turn down the appointment.
I'm glad he has now been appointed Dean of St. Alban's (even though it is a lesser post than bishop), primarily because it will p*ss off the same Anglican conservatives who are trying to get the entire U.S. Episcopal Church kicked out for "abandonment of Biblical standards of morality."

And I hope Fr. John will have learned from his own experience what giving in to pressure from rabid conservatives gains you (
nothing) and emerge radicalized from his experience!