Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is Osama on the U.S. payroll?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
mopaul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-16-04 06:17 AM
Original message
Is Osama on the U.S. payroll?
seems awfully odd indeed that he should release another one of his greatest hits, one day after bush's disastrous press conference.
the 'experts' insist, it really is Osama on the tape, and he threatens the whole of Europe with violence or benevolence. he wants all euro nations who've sent soldiers to Iraq to remove them, or face terror attacks.

how con-veeeeeeeeeeenient. we all know the bush and bin ladens families have a decades long relationship. we know the c.i.a. trained him to fight, supplied him with the arms he needed, gave him millions, and that daddybush is a c.i.a. man himself.

everyone always asks, 'when are we going to get Osama?'. he's the guy who attacked us, right? hell, we got Saddam out of a spiderhole, why can't we find Osama? i think i know why.

he works for the u.s. government, plain and simple. they know exactly where he is, and they have no intention of capturing him.
the best we can hope for, is a phony assassination, with a mangled body, and an official story.

and don't forget that Osama is still issuing threats from his hidy holes. cheney has assured us that another attack is imminent, and our man in Afghanistan, is at the ready, to continue the zany festivities. probably around sept. or Oct., as many have conjectured.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-16-04 06:27 AM
Response to Original message
1. yes my tin foil was on for that
it was just too weird that when bush struggles to hold the coalition of the willing{with the help of taxpayer bribes} osama makes them an offer they have to refuse.
mario puzo couldn't have written this better himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-16-04 06:49 AM
Response to Original message
2. Osama is dead n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopaul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-16-04 06:51 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. that's very possible
and plausible. i've certainly considered it too. anytime the c.i.a. verifies the authenticity of one of osama's tapes, i get instantly suspicious
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wickerman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-16-04 07:32 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. It has always seemed in the past that verification took days
not minutes. Some official sounding dude you never heard of would issue a stern warning that "we can't yet verify the voracity of the tape. Test are being co ducted. We have our best agents rerecord, er, analyzing the tape now. We simply can't say, it will be days."

This one gets instant confirmation? :tinfoilhat: At the very least we have had this one and were sitting on it, waiting for when it would be most useful.

Good linkage, Mopaul
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-16-04 06:55 AM
Response to Original message
4. Deep cover
Al Q. doesn't know that Osama is an agent provacotuer.
He is the Buscho ace in the deck. Think about it. 911 was the best thing that has happened to Bushco. The War on Terror is a surefire
method of keeping the American sheep in their pens, docile and fear ridden.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KeepItReal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-16-04 06:59 AM
Response to Original message
5. He is officially no longer on the CIA's payroll
because his work in Afghanistan vs. the Soviets was done...but it does make you wonder if he's getting "Deferred Compensation" like Mr. Cheney gets from Halliburton.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-16-04 07:47 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. not the CIA, the Caryle group &
& the company that the Bin Laden family run.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DarkSim Donating Member (266 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-16-04 07:04 AM
Response to Original message
6. They already have Osama nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dusty64 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-16-04 07:33 AM
Response to Original message
8. I've been thinking
that for a long time unfortunately. Its sad I think so badly of our government but I do and do not trust anything they say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-16-04 07:41 AM
Response to Original message
9. Bin Laden (who's "on the payroll") double-crossed Bush
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beam Me Up Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-16-04 08:03 AM
Response to Original message
11. Not "US" but the "Carlyle Group" (or same as), yes.
I recommend EVERYONE stop thinking in terms of "the government" doing things like 9/11--or paying Osama.

Given recent events in Iraq, we've just begun to uncover THE USE OF PRIVATE MILITARY "SECURITY" PERSONNEL.

The question isn't simply who is "paying" Osama, but who "is" Osama, really. Who does he work for? To what extent is what we know about him a media creation--a kind of "myth" that is "useful" at certain times by certain people.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrPrax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-16-04 08:48 AM
Response to Original message
12. Good Point...
If you look at the latest diplomatic salvo from OBL ...

1)the guy's is treated more lucidly in the Media than other real politicians like say Kofi or those French or half a dozen moderate Iraqis on the Governing Council or the British Commanders critical of US military policy or the Polish commander who is fuming that the US military didn't bother to co-ordinate or tell any allies about their military attacks...

2) you notice OBL has open a new era of AQ Diplomacy...It isn't the usual 'river of blood' niceities...He is asking that Europe join in a 'coalition' of sorts with It and NOT the US essentially...

3) the US started the lastest escalation in Iraqi violence (unprecedented), began a dangerous path for international law with Sharon (unprecedented), the canned appraisal of AQ operating the 'resistence' in Iraq (widely disputed by anyone with half a brain) and a scary 'national speech' that probably made even his closet allies cringe....

It must be a script...the US is at odds on many front with it's coalition and as such the 'tape' is simply to offset any ally deviance with a built-in condemnation and refutation by mainly the US media...the script worked with th Spanish...why not expand on it
"Us" vs. "Them"...clash of civilizations...freedom lovers vs. freedom haters...quite primitive really

I am having increasing suspicions about this whole AQ thing and NOT just OBL as it's annoited Leader...
It might be everyone has underestimated the Bushite's agenda--they might be contemplating the uncontemplatable...

If you look at it...the world doesn't really need to be convinced...only the US population does need convincing of the potential 'treason' of allies....
Like a draft, this apprenhensive of having allies is necessary for a much larger agenda...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC