CNN poll - Coalition or Insurgents responsible for trouble?

[swag]

DeFreep the Freak in Me:

http://www.cnn.com/

[ithacan]

1. no brainer

how can anyone answer anything but the Coalition? Unless they're drinking the Bush Koolaid...

[Nicholas D Wolfwood]

3. I can understand why some would argue otherwise

If you view the options as "our soldiers or their soldiers", which I'm sure many non-DUers and non-Freepers do. In which case, you don't want to think our boys are doing anything wrong over there, even though they shouldn't be there to begin with.

[mike_c]

5. I'm afraid lots of DU'ers have this perspective also...

[mindfulNJ]

2. kick

*

[radwriter0555]

4. as in, "did we get away with inventing a reason to STAY in iraq bu sending

those mercs in to be killed?"

YUP.

WE GOT AWAY WITH IT! The americans are STILL SUCKERS!

[4MoreYearsOfHell]

6. Actually the poll should read

How effective is Bushco's Iaraqi propaganda campaign...

[Options Remain]

7. why DU or Freep it in the first place

there are good arguements on both sides. I personally beleive both are responsible.

TearForger

[xchrom]

9. hello?!?

no occupation = no insurgents.
unless of course you believe in the whole wmd thingy that sank like a rock ever so long a go?
or maybe replacing saddam with an embezler is more rational?

[vern]

8. the poll is flawed, no?

shouldn't the choices be "occupation" and "resistance"? once again, cnn demonstrates their bias.