Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

DUMB QUESTION: Condi. What time tomorrow??? (be there, Aloha)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
CaptainMidnight Donating Member (611 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-04 09:53 PM
Original message
DUMB QUESTION: Condi. What time tomorrow??? (be there, Aloha)
Sorry,

But as much as this topic's been flogged to death, I still don't know what time she is set to testify.

If anyone here knows, could you please post both Eastern and Pacific times for this?

Captain Clueless
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
notadmblnd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-04 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. 9 am eastern
Edited on Wed Apr-07-04 09:54 PM by notadmblnd
Be there!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-04 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. That is 3:00 am in Hawaii!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Langis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-04 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. Damnit!!
I'll be asleep
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shockingelk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-04 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. Is NPR carrying it? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrotherBuzz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-04 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Yep, and everyone else, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kera Donating Member (294 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-04 10:18 PM
Response to Original message
5. i think
the testimony will be just wool over the eyes because one of the commissioner member just said on fox that the commission conclusions are already known which is that if the government has been working properly for the past 10 year , may be September 11 would have prevented
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-04 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Given what we now know today. all of the warnings the Bush Team recieved,
they were supposed to be better prepared. The Pubs/Bush Guys/ dropped the damn ball, pure and simple.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-04 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. The last ten years? The last ten years?
So, Clinton is implicated. Which commission member said this?

As much as Clarke supports Tenet, it appears the CIA reluctantly relented to requests, and always came up with a 'non-recommendation'. And the FBI,,,well forget the FBI...

The CIA and FBI suffered from the momentum syndrome - they could only move in the their rutted path - cold war and crime. And they couldn't even keep track of their money or computers.

Ten years agao, we didn't have knowledge of al Queda - they barely had knowledge of that title, but yes they were angy and the anger grew.

It seems to me that Clarke lit a fire under Clinton, Gore, Albright and Berger, but failed to light one under Rice, Powell, Rumsfeld, Bush.

So, we're going to be fed crap again?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kera Donating Member (294 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-04 11:49 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. listen my dear poster
I have no expectations whatsoever from this commission

I just want to bring to your attention something very strange indeed a language that usually doesn't square well with the qualification of a witness .

every pundit, every official is saying when talking about the up coming testimony " she is smart, she will do very well. she is very articulate, she will do just fine "

the witness role is usually to lay facts that are the truth nothing but the truth , to help the adjudicator to make a determination about whatever , here all they are concerned with is that she will do fine , like if she is candidate for an athletic competition and all fans are eager to see her win, I am confused, all rules, norms and standards have been tampered with, mixed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lindsay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-04 11:52 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. The pundits and officials you hear
are all tools of the (mis)administration. Their job is to convince you of what they're telling you, not to tell you the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Nov 26th 2014, 06:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC