Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

isn't anybody watching tweety just BLOW Karen Hughes, or something?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
buycitgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-04 06:33 PM
Original message
isn't anybody watching tweety just BLOW Karen Hughes, or something?
jsut turned it on, and am switching off, as I heard him ask this?

do you find it interesting the the president working with such STRONG women; you and Condi?

then he follows up with something about Laura possibly disapproving

I can't stand it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-04 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. oh yuck
Tweety is trying again, without success, to be entertaining
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buycitgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-04 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. can somebody please explain to me
how a loathesome, lying, uh, can't use that word, like Hughes just gets away with the most outRAGEOUS propaganda, and isn't called on it at all?

contrast it with reasonable statements by just about any opposing voice, and they're shouted down in the most scabrous manner

not to mention, does she EVER face another person in this gladhanding parade, like most left-leaning authors, who have to suffer the likes of John Fund, or Laura Ingraham, or somesuch droolmonkey?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-04 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. The question of the day
but we live in a very, very strange world right now
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
displacedtexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-04 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. No. West Wing rerun is better.
Not watching the Bush* lover.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fenris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-04 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
3. She just said that W's speech at the U.S. will go down in history
As some kind of remarkable use of the power of the presidency and an example of a leader standing up to terror and evil. These people are truly brainfucked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buycitgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-04 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. you know what I can't WAIT for?
when this turdbuckle and all his henchmen/women are ridden out of town on a rail in less than seven months, and he's finally exposed as the lamest, most perfidious/worthless, laziest, unctuous, vapid, transparent, iditotic, moronic, witless, inexpressive, jejune, vindictive, superstitious, parsimonious, hypocritical, etc, etc, bastard our poor nation has EVER seen.........

THEN, we can replay fatuous comments like the ones Hughes and dumbo's other hagiographers have spewed out, and LAUGH LAUGH LAUGH LAUGH our collective ASSES off!!!!!!


how SWEET that will be.

well, tempered with the sense of awful loss these monsters have occasioned upon the entire world

man, that good mood sure didn't last very long
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DenverDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-04 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #8
16. Brief flashes of a good mood are all we can hope for these days.
21st century reality is a mofo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CHestonsucks Donating Member (84 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-04 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #8
19. Well spoken.
I'm waiting for just the same thing.

The lights are on and NOBODY HAS EVER BEEN HOME!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kskiska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-04 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
5. I just read somewhere how Clarke was castigated
for giving out the White House spin, which is required while working for *, when Hughes comes out and does the same thing unabashedly, and no one calls her on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-04 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Well, I don't recall that he was ever castigated on it while working there
The only castigating has occurred since he publicized the book and served as a 9-11 investigating committee witness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike1963 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-04 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
7. I wtchtd itt fr a feu mminitess nnow Ihavto clen tha vommitt of ta kuybord
&%$#%^&*(()*(&(^&&^%#@@
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-04 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. I wonder if we need to start a DU Masochism Forum
for the times that we watch the mediawhores and need to confess :-).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buycitgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-04 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. I know......I took MSNBC, CNN, and CNBC off the remote yesterday
and can't stay completely away

meanwhile, tweety is rerunning segment of him with Clarke, and asking him MUCH tougher questions than he did Hughes

bleaaaaaaaahhhhhhh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lugnut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-04 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
12. As he was sucking up to KH
I was screaming at the TV. He never once called her on any of the lies that were flowing from her lips. The love-fest between them was disgusting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emboldened Chimp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-04 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
13. I don't understand why people get so worked up about Tweety
Nobody watches the guy's show, so don't sweat it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ezee Donating Member (615 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-04 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
14. IT is amazing to me
how close the questions that CM asked her, and the questions that Larry King asked her, are. Its like they were given a script to follow and she had her answers down pat. I swear I thought I was having a flash back to last night!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buycitgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-04 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
15. thank zeus for Somerby
In this mornings Post, Allen explains the approach Rice will take tomorrow. According to sources, the uber-script will be hauled out againDear Leader Bush was quite vigilant:

ALLEN: National security adviser Condoleezza Rice plans to testify tomorrow that the Bush administration was acting in a pre-Sept. 11 mindset in its efforts to combat al Qaeda and other terrorist groups and must be judged in that context, administration officials said yesterday.
At the same time, Rice plans to argue that President Bush focused aggressively on terrorism before the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. The CIA had warned for several months that a massive al Qaeda strike was possible.

Can that possibly be the line Rice will follow? We wonder if Allen is being spun. Could Rice possibly say that the Bush Admin was stuck in a pre-9/11 mindset? Thats the claim critics like Clarke have brought forward in their attacks against Bush!
But notice the one omnipresent claimDear Leader was alert and focused. How could Rice claim that? a critic might ask. After all, didnt Bush tell Robert Woodward that he wasnt on point before 9/11? It seemed that way when we read Bush at War. But a new script may now have emerged.

Last night, Karen Hughes was asked about this matter on Larry King Live. Her answer? Bush was misquoted:

CALLER: Can you please explain to me what President Bushs own words meant that he said to Bob Woodward which were, paraphrased, Im sorry, if al Qaeda was not urgent, I was not on point, I was not thinking about Osama bin Laden. To me, it begins and ends there.

HUGHES: Thats slightly somewhat of a misquote. I was in the office when the president did that interview with Bob Woodward. What he was actually asked about was killing Osama bin Laden, assassinating Osama bin Laden. You understand, that is always a very difficult decision for any American president. Thats something that our country is rightly very concerned about, the idea of assassination of a foreign national. Particularly before September 11.


don't miss the rest, I MEAN it!
http://www.dailyhowler.com/dh040704.shtml

scroll down about half way
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-04 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
17. I had the exact same reaction. I changed the channel at the same point..
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cybildisobedience Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-04 07:31 PM
Response to Original message
18. couldn't bear to get through it.....
About halfway through, I thought, "Why am I listening to this crap? I can hear Repuke propaganda 24 hours a day?" So I switched to the home and garden network. When I came back, hoping Kar-man Hughes was off, I heard Tweety asking her about Bush being so comfortable around strong women?
Strong women, my ass.
He clearly has "mommy" issues, and if he ever really had anyone stand up to him in his entire life, his empty head would explode.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Sep 17th 2014, 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC