snip> Intrigue surrounds Ashcroft and former FBI Director Louis Freeh testimony at 9/11 hearings; to follow Condi, next week... Developing...
NYT: Commission officials said that evidence gathered by the commission showed that Freeh had become so personally involved in managing a handful of criminal investigations and in other struggles with the Clinton White House that the potential for a domestic terrorist attack by al-Qaida got relatively little attention...
Commission officials said their evidence showed that Ashcroft had taken little interest in counterterrorism before Sept. 11... *************************
I hope they got what they wanted . . . they kept their hand stuck down Clinton's trousers the entire time he was in office. They just couldn't let go of Clinton's johnson and pay attention to what was really important.
I believe that there is a bombshell somewhere which we don't know about but is about to break. Reminds me of the time right before the Watergate Taping System revelation.
5. This really should be the best the administration could hope for
If it is determined by the 9/11 comission that the administration was alseep at the wheel and was really just completely disinterested in protecting us from terrorism, then the administration should consider themselves very lucky.
Because as disgusting as their actions were, it is better that people think that they were just apathetic and unprepared than for the public to realize that 9/11 happened because Bush NEEDED it.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.