Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

All intelligence agencies agreed there were WMDs before the war?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 12:47 AM
Original message
All intelligence agencies agreed there were WMDs before the war?
Edited on Fri Apr-02-04 12:48 AM by LoZoccolo
WTF? Someone told me this in an argument just a few minutes ago, but I don't believe it. What could he have been talking about? I guess I'd think, why did they have to make up so many lies if they had evidence?

on edit: By "all", I mean, just about every countries'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 12:49 AM
Response to Original message
1. Bull
Just ask David Kay, and he is no Democrat, he will tell you that the intelligence sucked!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4morewars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 12:50 AM
Response to Original message
2. au contraire...
i believe they agreed the opposite was true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 12:53 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Yeah...
That's why I'm puzzled why he'd even say this. He said "why were the sanctions still in place then" and I honestly couldn't think of why, but then I'm like, well why wasn't everyone behind us and why would Colin Powell have to present some farcical largely-plaguerized old report before the UN?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4morewars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 12:58 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. sounds like he's talkin' outta his ass n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 12:52 AM
Response to Original message
3. No
All intelligence agencies "thought" there were WMD in Iraq when the IWR and 1441 were passed in OCTOBER. By the time of the invasion in MARCH, the position of most countries was that they did not know whether there was really WMD in Iraq or not. They were arguing that there was NO piece of intelligence that said WMD existed at all. Ask the person to point you to one piece of intelligence that said "WMD is in location 'x'". I guarantee you they won't be able to do it. The best anybody could say in MARCH was that Saddam wasn't participating in a disarmament in the manner other countries had in the past.

We now know it's probably because he had no idea what was going on in his own country either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ezee Donating Member (615 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 01:04 AM
Response to Original message
6. wmds
read Al Franken's book, Lie's and the lying liars who tellthem, chapter 41. it will help you with your argument I think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 01:33 AM
Response to Original message
7. There were WMDs untill the UN took them,
which of course was before the war.
By the time Bush started harping about WMDs, those were long gone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal Veteran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
8. Here
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/01/18/iraq/main537096.shtml


"So frustrated have the inspectors become that one source has referred to the U.S. intelligence they've been getting as "garbage after garbage after garbage." In fact, Phillips says the source used another cruder word. The inspectors find themselves caught between the Iraqis, who are masters at the weapons-hiding shell game, and the United States, whose intelligence they've found to be circumstantial, outdated or just plain wrong."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 03:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC