Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Has John Ashcroft been subpoenad?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Pax Argent Donating Member (350 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-27-04 03:01 PM
Original message
Has John Ashcroft been subpoenad?
Edited on Sat Mar-27-04 03:02 PM by leftbehind
I was just thinking about this:

- John Ashcroft was directed not to use commercial aircraft prior to 9-11.

- John Ashcroft was the man who set the priorities of the FBI prior to 9-11 and felt that terrorism was so important that it merited a brief mention under gun violence in his mission priority statements from 2001.

- John Ashcroft, from what I recall, also cut funding for terrorism prior to 9-11.

I have seen evidence of all of these things over time here, but it occured to me I hadn't seen any evidence that he was going to testify under oath at the 9-11 Commission.

Has anyone else heard what his status is in relation to the 9-11 Commission? Will he be testifying (hopefully under oath)?


This is my first thread. Please be gentle. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
asthmaticeog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-27-04 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. Isn't he still in the hospital?
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kazak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-27-04 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. I believe he's been released.
No link, but I seem to remember seeing that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thebigidea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-27-04 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. Where is John Ashcroft right now?
I think it'd go a little something... like this...

http://www.terminalproduct.com/ashcroftrehab.mp3
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
molly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-27-04 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
3. I agree - he should be forced to testify
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thebigidea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-27-04 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. he will next month, I'm sure...
Edited on Sat Mar-27-04 03:05 PM by thebigidea
unless his recent "health problems" are laying the groundwork for him to... gasp... WEASEL OUT OF TESTIFYING.

Criswell Predicts!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pax Argent Donating Member (350 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-27-04 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. I was struck by the convenience of the "health problems" as well
although it didn't hit me until this morning. It'll be interesting to see how this plays out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skeptic9 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-27-04 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. It seems to me current and former FBI directors would just HAVE...
... to testify at the next set of 9-11 Commission hearings, given its title, "Law Enforcement and the Intelligence Community. Washington, DC, April 13-14, 2004"

But the Commission won't release its witness list until about April 3rd, according to http://www.9-11commission.gov/hearings/index.htm :

"The following represents the remainder of the Commissions 2004 investigative hearing schedule:

March 23-24, 2004 Counterterrorism Policy Washington, DC

April 13-14, 2004 Law Enforcement and the Intelligence Community Washington, DC

May 18-19, 2004 Emergency Response New York City The 9-11 Plot New York City

June 8-9, 2004 National Crisis Management Washington, DC

Additional information, including times, locations, and panels, will be disseminated approximately ten days prior to each hearing. Such information will also be available on the Commissions website--www.9-11commission.gov. Hearing dates and topics are subject to change at any time.

AL FELZENBERG, DEPUTY FOR COMMUNICATIONS National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States

Office: 202-401-1725 Cell: 202-236-4878 Fax: 202-296-5545"

[email protected]
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
9215 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-27-04 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
8. Also, if Sibel Edmonds (the translator who Ashcroft tried to buy off)
testifies then Ashcroft would neccessarily have to be called to testify. Edmonds is to Ashcroft what Clarke is to Condi.

PS. You mispelled "supoenad", hee, hee. I likes hasslin' newbies. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-27-04 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
9. Hope so. I would like to see Willie Brown under oathe as well to let
us know who warned him off flying 9-11.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
9215 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-27-04 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Good one.
:thumbsup:

We need to get these people who were warned, or know intel was manipulated, or twisted, etc. and put them on the stand. Multiple corroborations for the lies of these fascisti are out there. Let's hope the Commission will bring these people out and then set the stage for a Special prosecutor to begin an investigation.

Find out why Ashcroft stopped flying on commercial aircraft in July.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC