Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clinton on fighting terrorism. If only we had such leadership....

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
9215 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-04 06:03 PM
Original message
Clinton on fighting terrorism. If only we had such leadership....



Compared to the costs of fighting a new generation of
terrorists, putting 100 million kids in school around
the world is an inexpensive proposition.

William Clinton, 2002


Just imagine what wonders this could do. Not only stop terrorism, but reduce poverty!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-04 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. It'll get more expensive to try to stop symptoms rather than to
stop the problem as time goes by. Bush's fascist cabal can restrict freedoms, invoke the draft, wade hip-deep in blood, set up some more gaudy photo-ops, and wave a flag when he's not scribbling his moniker all over them, but his tactics will only exacerbate problems. Not even remotely resolve them.

Clinton is quite right.

Truly awful people will always exist. But it makes more sense to reduce their numbers rather than increasing them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-04 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. Tsk, no profit in that.
</sarcasm>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nondeskript Donating Member (26 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-04 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
3. Just imagine...
What wonders this could have done a decade ago...

-DW
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DerBeppo Donating Member (452 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-04 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. exactly
this isn't a new problem, where was he with this 10 years ago? sure he didn't invade iraq, but he had no problem launching cruise missle after cruise missle.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
9215 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-04 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Possibly, IMO most likely, Clinton was
given BS info on Iraq. The intelligence community has been known to mislead Presidents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nondeskript Donating Member (26 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-04 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Um... Iraq isn't really the issue here though
Its really the fact that Clinton knew terrorism was a problem (a string of attacks on US targets through the 90s erase any doubt) and most people knew what the causes were (poverty, education) and not enough was done to solve said problem.

If more had been done, there is a good chance that terrorism would not have been as severe a problem today and Bush wouldn't have been able to find a rationalization that stuck to invade Iraq with.

I guess that hindsight is 20/20 and Clinton isn't exempt from that any more than anyone else.

-DW
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glarius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-04 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. P.M. Pierre Trudeau said "if the wealthy countries don't do something to
improve the conditions in the poor countries, it will come home to haunt us!".....I remember when he gave this warning in the 70's....He was ahead of his time in warning about the need for aid to these countries, but he was not heeded....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-04 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. One thing you need to remember ~ Congress spends the money
Clinton was at the mercy of a Republican Congress for quite a bit of his term and there is no way in hell the Republicans would allow one red cent to go toward education of foreigners, not if there is some implement of death they could build instead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-04 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. he was hog tied
by ken starr, and a pack of rabid rethugs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minstrel Boy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-04 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
8. Makes sense, but it's not in the cards.
Neo-feudalism's where it's at. That's the world that's under construction. And part of US military policy is to defend it.

In "Vision for 2020," published by the US Space Command, "the globalization of the world economy...will continue with a widening between 'haves' and 'have nots.'" As the world's poor get poorer, and grow in number, they become a prospective enemy worthy of demonization, pre-emptive strikes and occupation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 06:30 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC