Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Paul Krugman: Why Bush hasn't captured bin Laden

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
radwriter0555 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-04 05:06 PM
Original message
Paul Krugman: Why Bush hasn't captured bin Laden
Edited on Wed Mar-17-04 05:40 PM by radwriter0555
snip

The Bush administration, which baffled the world when it used an attack by Islamic fundamentalists to justify the overthrow of a brutal but secular regime, and which has been utterly ruthless in its political exploitation of the Sept. 11 attacks, must be very, very afraid.

Polls suggest that a reputation for being tough on terror is just about the only remaining political strength that President George W. Bush has. Yet this reputation is based on image, not reality. The truth is that Bush, while eager to invoke Sept. 11 on behalf of an unrelated war, has shown consistent reluctance to focus on the terrorists who actually attacked America, or their backers in Saudi Arabia and Pakistan.
.
This reluctance dates back to Bush's first months in office. Why, after all, has his inner circle tried so hard to prevent a serious investigation of what happened on Sept. 11? There has been much speculation about whether officials ignored specific intelligence warnings, but what we know for sure is that the administration disregarded urgent pleas by departing Clinton officials to focus on the threat from Al Qaeda.
.
After Sept. 11, terrorism could no longer be ignored, and the military conducted a successful campaign against Al Qaeda's Taliban hosts. But the failure to commit sufficient U.S. forces allowed Osama bin Laden to escape. After that, the administration appeared to lose interest in Al Qaeda; by the summer of 2002, bin Laden's name had disappeared from Bush's speeches. It was all Saddam Hussein, all the time.

more http://www.iht.com/articles/510524.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Killarney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-04 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. Krugman's best column yet!
This is our angle.

BUSH is soft on defense, not Kerry. Bush is so fucking stupid, he took resources off the real enemy to take down Saddam who had NOTHING. Meanwhile, Al Queda grows back to top form and blasts Spain and they're probably readying for another attack here. Bush is such an idiot, he couldn't even get this right. He promised to protect us and dismantle Al Queda and DID NOT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-04 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Agreed --
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-04 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yes, Kerry has the high ground on this issue as well
bushsucks* has continued to flounder on the security issue as he has done many things about it but accomplished nothing. Kerry should press this point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RBHam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-04 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
4. BushCo was served well by the Iraqi hotel bombing
Keep the public distracted

Chaotic terror blamed on the shadowy, nebulous "terrorists" who want to KILL US ALL!!!!

- we must "pull together", show American "resolve"

...you're either with us or with bin laden...

Don't look behind the mirror!!!

Nice touch, having the bomb go off in front of Al Jazeera's offices!

Good one, Rummy!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moderator DU Moderator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-04 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
5. radwriter0555
Per DU copyright rules
please post only four
paragraphs from the
news source.

Thank you

DU Moderator
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radwriter0555 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-04 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. OOPS. didn't know it pasted up so long....
SORRY!!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC