Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Something we Democrats ought to note about Nader supporters

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
MrSoundAndVision Donating Member (879 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 08:23 PM
Original message
Something we Democrats ought to note about Nader supporters
Accusing them of risking the political future of this country by voting for what they believe isn't exactly the best way to win their hearts and minds. This is a democracy. Vote for who you want. That's how it works. Don't be assholes. If you think that Ralph Nader is going to steal likely voters from the Democratic ticket, well then work harder at persuading them that your platform (or candidate) is better. Don't stink up the place with ABB farts, it's just not a coeherent political smell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
php1949 Donating Member (89 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. Sorry, but I'm going to speak the truth about Nader and his supporters
Human life is worth more than principles. A Bush reelection means a loss of human life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrSoundAndVision Donating Member (879 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. The truth huh, and what's that?
See if they start agreeing with your politics with that attitude.

And I most certainly don't support Ralphie nor have I ever. I'm just saying, ah to hell with it.

Can't people think for themselves even when their livelihood demands it? God I fucking hate the media, you people just eat mainstream media for breakfast don't you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
southerngirlwriter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. The truth......
Note: all "you" and "your" here is generic, not personal.

Remember high school? You had your jocks, your nerds, your theatre types, your dangerous types, your potheads, etc.

Then there was that kid -- maybe there were two or three -- who was just too cool for anything. They didn't like video games, they didn't care about their grades, they didn't care about dating, they didn't fret over their looks, they didn't fret over anything because they were just too cool for it all.

In their minds, not caring about anything made them cooler than everyone else, which is of course the ultimate irony -- they were more concerned about being cool than everyone else put together.

Sorry for overusing the word "cool," as I don't know what the current lingo is.

That kid in my class growing up was named Kara. If someone liked a new band's CD, she'd roll her eyes. It was so stupid to be a fan of some stupid band. If someone got excited about a new teacher's interesting project, she'd roll her eyes. We were so stupid to give a shit about a fucking homework assignment.

Anybody who was a fan of anything -- who was passionate about anything, who believed in anything -- was sneered at by Kara. I've met Karas in all walks of life.

They are twisted, emotionally crippled assholes who don't really care about anyone or anything, except themselves.

Those are Nader voters. No, the Democratic party isn't perfect, but to take a deep breath and vote for what's best for the country -- getting that dickhead out of office -- would just be so, so, like-everyone-else. So, not above-it-all-looking-down.

They're going to troop to the polls and vote for Nader. If by some miracle of Almighty God we win anyway, the minute someone gripes about something they don't like President Kerry (or Edwards or Kucinich or whoever) doing, it'll be, "I didn't vote for that fucking idiot. I voted for Nader!" with an arrogant little snicker.

This year, those types will be joined by people who are highly embarrassed. They got excited and passionate about their candidate. He inspired them. I commend them for breaking out of their apathy long enough to get excited, and I commend him for what he did. But rather than taking the mature, adult route of saying, "What's best for my country?" and doing it, they're going to pull the lever for Nader because they're pissed off. They're angry and disappointed and grieving, but rather than growing up, they're going to vote for Nader. That way they, in their twisted little minds, get it both ways. If whistle-ass gets another term, they can say, "See what happened? You should have voted for my guy!" That their guy didn't win a single primary in his own party won't mean shit to them. That their guy was someone America wasn't ready for won't mean shit. Their hurt feelings mean shit to them, nothing else.

I sympathize with their hurt feelings. I grant them their right to their pain.

Voting third-party to deal with it is something that we're not going to talk them out of, no matter how nice, sweet, understanding, or boot-licking we become. They're not acting out of reason or patriotism -- they're acting out of their own self-interest. You can't talk them out of that. It's based on their feelings, not their thinking.

Try and change someone else's feelings. Go on. I dare you.

Forgive me if I seem angry at you. I'm not. I'm frustrated.

Nader votes as protests when what's on the line is the total destruction of the environment, the reinstatement of the draft, four (or more) additional wars, the demolishment of the bill of rights, etc., is pure, childish irresponsibility.

"It's America! I'll vote for whoever I want!"

No, it's not America anymore. And your Nader vote will hasten the destruction.

If less than 1% of Nader voters in just one state had voted with their brains instead of their feelings, whistle-ass wouldn't be in office. 500+ American boys and girls wouldn't be dead. Thousands of Iraqi children would have both arms and both parents. The right to choose would not be in jeopardy.

Less than 1% in one state.

That's all it would have taken.

I like Kerry and Edwards as people, but neither has the platform I want. Oh, well. I'm a grown-up. What I want isn't what's most important. Saving this country from the Bush Crime Family and the fascist right wing is what's important.

And the fact that I have to say this on DU is sickening and saddening.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TreasonousBastard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. Hear! Hear!
Well said.

I go a step further, though. I have no sympathy for anyone who insists on picking up the marbles and going home when the game isn't going exactly right.

An election is to pick the best candidate from among the choices. If the choices are reduced to what seems at first glance unacceptable, they are the choices, and a choice still must be made.

Staying home is a choice, as is a protest vote, but these are false choices. Unless both candidates are hopelessly corrupt and inept, it does not help the better one win.

It is merely the whining, selfish arrogance of children throwing tantrums at not getting their way.

It will be Bush vs Kerry, or perhaps Edwards. Vote for the better one.

Shouldn't be too difficult to figure out which one that is.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
southerngirlwriter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Well said, and much more succinctly than I managed.
I keep thinking about a woman I've never met, but you know who I'm referring to -- a prolific DUer with a kid over in Iraq.

If Nader and the whining Nader-protest-vote types give * another term and her kid doesn't make it home for years, or comes home in a box, I wonder what comfort it will be to her that they voted ideological purity over realism and practicality and common sense?

This stuff gives me a migraine. But then, I'm not cool. I care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #12
21. Well said...
... a "protest" vote is simply tilting at windmills. If you can talk yourself into believing it is the right thing, that only shows how gullible the listener is.

There is this thing called "maturity". When you get it you realize that the future of the country is more important than your symbolic useless "protest".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 12:28 AM
Response to Reply #12
33. LOL
Now that's hate speech!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sterling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 06:53 AM
Response to Reply #12
43. That is too funny.
You have a philosophy based on stereo types and resentment of your high school class mates? lol.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 08:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. Please. If they are still supporters after three years of..
bush, nothing I can say will change their hearts or minds one way or the other. They are already entrenched.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 08:32 PM
Response to Original message
4. A Difference Between Defenders and Supporters
I don't nor will support Nader, but I do defend his right to say what he wants, run if he wants and welcome the voice to the debate. Is that wrong?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sweetladybug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. I agree with IMRadioactive. I'll vote for the Democrat nominee
but I think Nader has a right to run for President and I welcome his voice to the debate. Democrats need to listen to what he has to say and work with him and his followers, then perhaps we could all be united in the Democrat Party.
RE-ELECT A DEMOCRAT IN 2004!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 12:27 AM
Response to Reply #4
32. Amen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 07:56 AM
Response to Reply #4
47. I guess
you want four more years of Bush then.

JUST KIDDING!!!!!


seriously though, people are not allowed to actively campaign here. Beyond that, it would be nice if there was more actual discussion of substance. I don't think a potential new voter coming here right now would be impressed, more likely horrified. There seems to be some kind of collective madness going on. If someone told me they were thinking of switching to Dem because they were beginning to see the light about Bush, I would not recommend they visit here right now.
It's not an exaggeration to say the atmosphere does not feel very welcoming.






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeatleBoot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
5. My kids deserve better than Ralph Nader
To think that this guy is going to try and prove something when my kids future is at stake.

Screw him. Its over.

Later Nader.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. Damn, that was well said!
Couldn't have said it better myself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sterling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 08:49 PM
Response to Original message
6. we as Democrats must work on our people skills.
Edited on Mon Feb-23-04 08:51 PM by Sterling
We seem to think they don't matter when it comes to some people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrSoundAndVision Donating Member (879 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #6
25. Yeah let's not club them over the head...
okay all?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ms_splash Donating Member (823 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
8. Remember why and when DU started
I (and many, many others) came here shortly following the atrocity of Selection 2000. I was pissed off at at Bush and pissed off at Nader and pissed off at people who voted for Nader.

I'm still pissed off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sterling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 06:34 AM
Response to Reply #8
36. I was pissed about the stolen election.
The black voters who were not allowed to vote made the difference. The fact we as Democrats have yet to address this is not to our credit. I can only blame Nader if I intentionally ignore what really happened down there.

It's easier to blame Nader than actually take on Bush, Harris and the RNC is it not? It won't get us anywhere but if it makes us feel better why not, huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 08:58 PM
Response to Original message
9. Again, we make 3% of the voters more important than the 45%
who'll vote Democrat. Sadly, they are only relevant because way too many will vote Republican. No single voter deserves this electoral power. Sorry, I'm not into elitist politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sterling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 06:38 AM
Response to Reply #9
37. So you are in favor of a new system?
What about the money? Sorry but elitist politics is not a bunch of progressives voting for someone who actually represents their core values. Elitist politics is the fact people can buy elections. The fact is our leaders are bought and sold and we as voters have very little say in the process. When we as Democrats are truely ready to address that we can start complaining about "elitist liberals"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ulysses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
10. you're making far too much sense.
Ban the apostate!

;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rowdyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 09:04 PM
Response to Original message
11. There's no way to persuade people
Edited on Mon Feb-23-04 09:05 PM by Rowdyboy
whose minds are already made up. People who demand perfection and will ONLY support someone who meets their impossible standards are not going to come around, no matter how gently you argue. Sometimes a fart in their general direction is about all you can do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ulysses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. strenuously misunderstanding people
is such a wonderful start to the rebuilding process.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
14. I am a democrat and a Nader supporter....
I also support the Green party candidates, the libertarians, and yes, even the republicans. It's called democracy. It only works if there's plurality. I think it's also time to start treating our adversaries with a bit of respect on DU. My grandmother used to say that the way a man treats his enemies shows a great deal about his breeding. OK, it was a paternal culture and not an eagalitarian one, but you get the point.

And I don't think I can spell tonight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robin Hood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
15. You're right, they can't be won. They are the enemy.
They are freepers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sterling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 06:40 AM
Response to Reply #15
38. Lets get em!!!
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cat Atomic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
19. I'm always amazed at the hostility towards Greens around here.
You can't whine and moan about pink tu-tu Democrats like Tom Daschle, then turn around and call Greens "the enemy".

Here's an idea. If you want Greens to vote Democrat, then pursue them. Woo them. If you're not willing to do that, then get off their frigging backs. They can vote for anyone they want to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. Let me correct you.
I have no hostility against Greens in general, just Ralph Nader. And I don't notice a lot of hostility around here against Greens, just against Ralph Nader.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cat Atomic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. Its all over the place.
Look above my post. It's not just hostility towards Nader.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sterling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 06:41 AM
Response to Reply #24
39. Anyone who votes Green is the enemy!!
:eyes: I see this all the time. It is truely for the weak of mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robin Hood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #19
48. Like the greens are so innocent.
I went to a rally four days before the 2000 election and Clinton was there with Gray Davis in San Jose California. A pack of greasy Nader supporters "crashed the party" and were incredibly rude and obnoxious. We all made the mistake of accomodating them as if theyr were our crazy old grandma, whacky part of the family.

We did make a mistake, they are wolves in sheeps clothing. They are not part of the family. They are the enemy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
union_maid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
20. You can't win them over, but...
we need to stop the infection of honestly idealistic newcomers to the electoral process. They don't always really get that our system is pretty locked into two parties and that voting for a third party doesn't change that at all. They need to understand what's at stake and that there's a predictable outcome to third party politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BillZBubb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
23. But, they are risking the political future of this country!
If they don't understand THAT, they don't understand anything.

This election is probably the most important in my lifetime. In the past, we could eke through another four years of this or that Repug--although Reagan was a test on that. This time it's different. We are heading into an economic abyss.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrSoundAndVision Donating Member (879 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
26. I wish I could make a memory-drug...
so you people would JUST REMEMBER that the Supreme Court replaced your democracy. Just cause it ain't on the news, and 'consumer advocate' is doesn't mean that what's real ain't real. k!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BiggJawn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 10:35 PM
Response to Original message
27. Nader supporters will NEVER be "won over" to "our side".
Thank you for a new re-tread of the old "Please don't upset the 'Swing Voters'!!!" meme.

Have you forgotten? they support Ralph because OUR guys are all crooked an "bought and paid for" corporate whores.
Telling them that I like their ego-maniacal multi-millionaire "poor boy fighting for the consumer" isn't going to win them over to ABB.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrSoundAndVision Donating Member (879 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. Oh so now there unencourageable....
because you don't want to expend the effort to try to convince them. We're all Americans, in the same rotting bread basket, and I think that discussion is the way to bring us out of this mess. Not casting people as too stupid to see ABB. Bush is just a face, he's just an Ari Fleischer of the corporate and financial elite in this country. We should really think about the Scott McClellen's out there too....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
southerngirlwriter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. Friend, you're missing the point.
It's not too STUPID to see the need for ABB.

It's too immature, too selfish.

You can't argue someone into maturity. They get there on their own, or they don't. I wish you could use arguments to make people grow up. We'd live in a much different world.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rowdyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 12:21 AM
Response to Reply #29
30. Its just a waste of time. You either get it or you don't...
Some people never will. If you need persuading to vote ABB, you're living in a bubble, unaware of whats happening to your country, your courts, your future...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sterling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 06:48 AM
Response to Reply #30
41. I get that the Dems will be hanging gays out to dry.
I hope you are ready to stand alone in the trenches for the next four years because the culture war is getting ready to get hot and you are the first course.

I will be there defending your rights but I have a feeling the party will not have our back. You as a gay matter about as much as the progressives to the NASCAR dad chasing DLC these days.

Vote against Bush in whatever form you feel suits you but lets not kid ourselves that getting rid of him is the solution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rowdyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 07:30 AM
Response to Reply #41
44. It beats the hell out of keeping him!
The longest journey begins with a single step...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 12:27 AM
Response to Reply #27
31. .
"they support Ralph because OUR guys are all crooked an "bought and paid for" corporate whores"

Who voted for the war and the Patriot Act. And No Child Left Behind.

What is your breaking point with politics as usual?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rowdyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 12:49 AM
Response to Reply #31
34. I, personally, have NO breaking point until the
BUSH BASTARDS ARE OUT OF THE WHITE HOUSE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BiggJawn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 07:40 AM
Response to Reply #31
46. So go ahead and vote for another 4 years of John Ashcroft.
and Rumsferatu, and Colon Bowel, and Dick "TinMan" Cheney. Vote for a repeal of women's rights. Vote for the outlawing of the Sierra Club. Vote for the Draft. I'll bet you're young enough to go, aren't you?

Let me ask you this. Who's idea was the war, PATRIOT act, and All childs left behind, anyway?
Not Kerry and Edwards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iverson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 06:17 AM
Response to Original message
35. usually not a matter of "Nader supporters"
From what I've seen the last few days, you're describing those who denounce Nader insufficiently, or else those who try to discern between a legitimate criticism and an illegitimate one.

It's the continuing shift rightward of the boundaries of permissible liberalism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 06:43 AM
Response to Reply #35
40. Democrats seem afraid of the Bush* regime...
...and thus need a lesser target to attack in the form of Nader.

- I've never seen this type of fear before in my 30 years of voting Democratic. It's as if the Dem leadership has given up on even trying to beat Bush* in 2004. Minority leader Daschle can't say enough nice things about George* and his 'war'.

- So Nader becomes an easy scapegoat to blame instead of ourselves for our own weaknesses.

- We can only blame ourselves if Bush* pulls off a win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sterling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 06:50 AM
Response to Reply #35
42. That is why I am glad Nader is running.
Unless NY is a big win for Dems I will probably not vote for Nader but I am glad he will be a factor so my core values will be represented in the political discourse. No sense having a skull and bones election that ignores root problems we are facing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
union_maid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 07:38 AM
Response to Original message
45. Tried that last time
And the assholism was all on their side, at least for a long time. I didn't hate Nader until fairly late in the process. I was just aware that there were differences between Democrats and Republicans and that those differences were very important to many people. I got lambasted in the most sophomoric and arrogant terms way before I was even trying to convince anyone of my views. I was just explaining why I wouldn't be voting Nader at that point. Got more heated as it became clear Nader was going back on this promise not to campaign in swing states and that he was hitting Gore a lot harder than Bush. If you've seen what happened in the last three years and you're even willing to consider voting Nader you're hopeless. I'm just interested in burying him so he won't infect more young minds with his dishonest rhetoric.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC