Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

9/11--Iraq WMD: 2 major intelligence failures on Bush's watch

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
skjpm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-04 11:31 AM
Original message
9/11--Iraq WMD: 2 major intelligence failures on Bush's watch
I mean, how bad a President do you have to be? You allow Americans to be attacked on our own soil, and then you send them to die in an unnecessary war. How can any patriotic American of any stripe support this guy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-04 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
1. The intelligence failure, was the failure of Bu$h's brain
who was too bored to bother his beautiful mind with any Intel that might disagree with his plans to implement the PNAC agenda for his daddy's buddies.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovedems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-04 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Intelligence failure should be the dems mantra for the entire year.
But it should be applied to *'s intelligence failure. He is such a dumbass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skjpm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-04 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. yes, the words "intelligence probe" conjure up. . .
images of where they should stick the tube in Bush to find the intelligence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-04 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
4. Oh, please, it is all Clinton's fault
9/11 and Iraq nothing to do with ignoring Hart-Rudman or the fact that Clinton destroyed any remaining WMD in '98...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rolling Titanic Donating Member (404 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-04 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
5. Didn't Rumsfeld say just a few months ago
that the intelligence had not changed (since the Clinton Administration) only the way of looking at it post-9-11? I could swear he said exactly that. And if that is the case, there could not a fortiori, be an "intelligence failure".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rolling Titanic Donating Member (404 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-04 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Here it is
The coalition did not act in Iraq because we had discovered dramatic new evidence of Iraq's pursuit of weapons of mass murder," Rumsfeld said.



He said the terrorist strikes on New York and Washington in 2001 "changed our appreciation of our vulnerability" to attacks with chemical, biological or nuclear weapons.

http://www.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/meast/07/10/sprj.irq.wmd/

(CBS/AP) Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld on Wednesday told Congress that the U.S. invaded Iraq not because of a new threat of weapons of mass destruction but because of new fears they might be used.



"The coalition did not act in Iraq because we had discovered dramatic new evidence of Iraq's pursuit of weapons of mass murder," Rumsfeld said. "We acted because we saw the existing evidence in a new light through the prism of our experience on Sept. 11."

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/07/09/iraq/main562451.shtml

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC