Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dick Cheney long profile in WP -- mum's the word

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
nixonwasbetterthanW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-18-04 09:50 AM
Original message
Dick Cheney long profile in WP -- mum's the word

... Cheney rarely gives interviews. It's been a conscious decision, he says ("Not enough hours in the day,") and one, he allows, that might contribute to the run of bad press he has received in recent months. The vice president has been charged in the media with overselling the specter of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq and engineering a rush to war. Halliburton, the energy services firm Cheney ran until 2000, was accused of overcharging the U.S. government on a contract to deliver oil in Iraq. While he has not been implicated in the matter, news accounts inevitably include the words, "the company previously run by Vice President Cheney."

White House officials have become concerned that negative stories about Cheney have reached critical mass, to a point that it could be harming the president. One of those concerned officials is Dick Cheney, who has been more bothered than usual by much of his recent coverage, sources close to the vice president say. Particularly on Halliburton, the subject of which triggers a quick rant against the press.

The media has changed a great deal, he says. "As an institution. Evolved. Kind of thing where it's almost impossible to catch up with a bad story. Factual errors." He mentions Lexis-Nexis, search engines, 24-hour news cycles, cable news. "Nobody goes back to check the accuracy," he says. "Can be frustrating."

( ... this is beyond belief, even for The Washington Post. Notice that Cheney engages in pot-calling-kettle-black nonsense about "factual errors," then offers NOT ONE WORD detailing how the press has allegedly gotten it wrong about his Halliburton ties. The ultimate eat-your-cake-and-have-it-too swipe at the media.)

<http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A26411-2004Jan17.html>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Dr.Phool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-18-04 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
1. Cheneys safe
He doesn't have to worry about his "boss" reading anything negative. He said he doesn't read newspapers.:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-18-04 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
2. We ignore Cheney at our peril
Edited on Sun Jan-18-04 11:40 AM by Stephanie
We have to force Cheney out into the light of day. HE is running thus administration, as we all know.

Cheney is PNAC/PNAC is Cheney (& Cheney's coterie). If you want to know what this admin is going to do next, just consult the PNAC papers. It's all there. Cheney doesn't have the smarts to come up with his own blueprint, he just adopted PNAC's.

Here is some of the recent coverage that Cheney is complaining about.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=104&topic_id=1021402
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC