Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Buck up, you lefties!: Justin Raimondo

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Domitan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-04 07:54 AM
Original message
Buck up, you lefties!: Justin Raimondo
Aside from Kerry's known limitations, however, I would urge the dejected to put their present travails in historical perspective. On November 11, 1972, Richard Nixon was reelected in what was truly a mandate for his monstrous foreign policy: it was one of the largest landslides in the history of American politics. Nixon crushed the Democratic nominee, Sen. George McGovern of South Dakota, taking more than 60 percent of the vote.

A few months later, Nixon aides G. Gordon Liddy and James W. McCord Jr. were convicted of conspiracy, burglary and wiretapping in the Watergate incident. By April, the Nixon White House was in disarray, as the Watergate conspirators scrambled in a vain attempt to cover up the cover-up. Senate hearings on the matter were convened in May. That summer, John Dean spilled his guts to Watergate investigators, who uncovered more incriminating evidence of illegal White House activities. October's Saturday Night Massacre sounded the death knell of Nixon's presidency, ensuring that, no matter what the ultimate outcome – impeachment or resignation – the 36th President of the United States would go down in the history books as a discredited and pathetic failure. A year after pulverizing the McGovernites – who, unlike the Kerry-ites, really were opponents of global interventionism – Nixon was whining "I am not a crook!"

While the issue has largely been lost sight of on account of special prosecutor Patrick J. "Bulldog" Fitzgerald's bulldoggish tactics – threatening to jail reporters for refusing to divulge their sources – his probe into the outing of CIA agent Valerie Plame by Washington neocons eager to discredit her husband, diplomat Joseph C. Wilson, is likely to reach into the Vice President's office – and, from there, insinuate its way into the White House. It's the cover-up, not the crime, that gets them every time…

Aside from confirming my predictive prowess – I meant relatively substantial compared to the 2000 contest – the Bush victory signifies much less than is readily apparent. Yes, it's one giant step backward, but the antiwar forces can confidently look forward to taking two or even three quite substantial steps forward in the months to come. While the public now knows that there were no "weapons of mass destruction," no lraqi links to 9/11, and no real threat to the U.S. posed by Saddam, the whole story of this administration's unparalleled mendacity has yet to be fully revealed. Bush's Watergate is bubbling up to the surface. The built-up pressure of months of investigations – years, in the case of the Israeli spy ring – is threatening to explode the deepest darkest secrets of the Bush White House onto the front pages. Now that Franklin has engaged Plato Cacheris, who first rocketed to fame as Attorney General John Mitchell's co-counsel in the Watergate case, the stage is set for a series of courtroom dramas – and possibly congressional hearings – that will not only tear the mask off the War Party but could discredit it for a good many years to come.

Screw John Kerry. We have just begun to fight.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Wright Patman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-04 07:58 AM
Response to Original message
1. Hope springs eternal
but does anyone seriously believe Nixon would have ever been forced from office if he had had both houses of Congress under his control?

The fact is he had neither and both House and Senate were in Democratic control by very large margins. In the early 1970s, most of the legislators from the South still belonged to the Democratic Party.

How do you "impeach" all three branches of government under the control of one party? You don't. You come down to either accepting the tyranny or ... see 1776.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onyourleft Donating Member (327 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-04 08:11 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. To say nothing of the fact that the media during Nixon's era was
not controlled by the White House. I have the feeling that no matter what is bubbling under the surface, the White House can shut down the media with a phone call. A good example is the latest tape; anyone heard that yet? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Domitan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-04 08:21 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. BUT DON'T FORGET
They did not have the internet back in the early 1970's. Granted it's a long and hard fight, but we the population are more armed with knowledge than before! It's what we do with it that counts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
starroute Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 12:36 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. The Washington Post was tight with the CIA!
Ben Bradlee was pals with James Angleton. Bob Woodward also had intelligence collections. (I think Naval Intelligence in his case.)

And don't forget Deep Throat.

If the Bush regime is coming down, it's going to be an inside job, just like with Nixon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WyLoochka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-04 08:53 AM
Response to Original message
4. Justin Raimondo
could have long ago aligned himself with leftist libertarians instead of the rightist libertarians (ie corporatists in the Mussolini tradition) that he foolishly aided and abetted for so long. Never too late to wise up though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
carnie_sf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-04 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
5. Treason baby
let the indictments roll
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 12:51 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Yep. We'll skip impeachment since we don't have the House
and go straight for prison. And reparations, of course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nightperson Donating Member (550 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 01:24 AM
Response to Original message
8. Here is the link:
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC