Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A Costly Free Lunch - WSJ's Al Hunt

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 11:10 PM
Original message
A Costly Free Lunch - WSJ's Al Hunt
Mr. Hunt invites comments to [email protected].

A Costly Free Lunch
October 7, 2004; Page A19

President Bush, in a town-hall meeting with carefully screened voters this week, told an Iowa farmer that he'll be able to keep his family farm if the estate tax is repealed. A little to the north, South Dakota Republican candidate John Thune, running for the Senate against Minority Leader Tom Daschle, has made total repeal of the estate tax one of the centerpieces of his quest. This may be good politics, but it's a fraud. Several years ago, an Iowa State University economist couldn't find a single true Iowa family farmer who had to sell the farm to pay estate taxes. In fact, few Iowa farmers pay the tax at all. Perhaps Mr. Bush found a rarity.

In South Dakota, Frank Slagle, a University of South Dakota Law School professor, says the estate tax is "irrelevant" to 99% of the state's population. Asked about this by the Associated Press, candidate Thune had an answer: "If not that many people have paid it, they won't miss it then."

(snip)

A recent Congressional Budget Office report unequivocally asserts that repeal of the estate tax will cause a pronounced drop-off in charitable contributions. In 2000, individuals made $212 billion in charitable contributions. Much flowed out of generosity and genuine commitment. Some, however, was facilitated by tax planning, particularly the estate tax, where, after providing a nice nest egg for any relatives, wealthier people find it more attractive to give to the alma mater or local hospital -- perhaps get something named after them -- than to Uncle Sam.

(snip)


When this sham was enacted several years ago, where were the colleges and universities and hospitals that will be hit so hard? Nowhere. Why?.. There is a more sinister explanation. Many of these institutions have wealthy trustees who would personally benefit from a measure that would hurt the institution they're supposed to be serving.

(snip)

There are plenty of good reasons to oppose outright repeal -- and favor sensible relaxation -- of the estate tax. It would reward a truly disingenuous and duplicitous political campaign; an unprecedented bonanza for the richest Americans is masked in quasi-populist language. President Bush and others frequently contend that repeal of this tax would be a boon to small businessmen and farmers, encourage entrepreneurs, make the tax code fairer, avoid double taxation and benefit middle-class families. The truth: Most genuine small businesses and family farms already escape estate taxes with exemptions and other exceptions. Repeal would, as Bill Gates Sr. and Warren Buffett have eloquently argued, exacerbate income inequity in America. Fewer than 2% of estates pay this levy and most of that is paid by the wealthiest 5% of estates. Mr. Gates talks about the need to "protect our democracy from a further buildup of hereditary wealth."

(snip)

URL for this article:
http://online.wsj.com/article/0,,SB109711330716538881,00.html




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 11:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. this is another reason that
family farms became "corporate farms". family run farms have become larger and more complex so they now run farms as such. whole different taxing rules. the only reason that a family farm was "death taxed" is when the owner did not leave a will. i know of several famlies that this happened to..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. Well written Truth-estate tax captures untaxed capital gain-isn't a death
Well written Truth-estate tax captures untaxed capital gain-isn't a "death" tax.

The rich WANTED an ESTATE TAX instead of keeping records of what they purchased that are need so as to tax unrealized capital gains at time of transfer of ownership.

This is just part of the GOP plan to not tax investment income so that the rich - who get 90% of their income from investment income - get a 90% tax cut.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogtag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 11:25 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yep, it's got a bit in common with the "Healthy Forests" initiative and
other Orwellian bogus repuke bits.

I remember hearing one of the talking heads at the repuke convention mention meeting John McCain's very elderly mother. The old girl had commented that she planned to live long enough for the 'death' tax to be repealed so her grandchildren could get her money. Either she's good one big fat estate or she's just another confused senior citizen fooled by the GOP spin machine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tibbir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-10-04 07:16 PM
Response to Original message
4. My 84 year old mother has less than $200,000 in total assets (much less)
but one of the reasons she supports the repukes so strongly is that they're against the "death" tax. By substitutine "death" in place of "estate" , the repukes have pulled off a huge propoganda triumph.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC