Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Najaf: "A Terrible Beauty is Born" (pro-Sadr op ed)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
blitzen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 10:34 PM
Original message
Najaf: "A Terrible Beauty is Born" (pro-Sadr op ed)
Edited on Thu Aug-19-04 10:39 PM by blitzen
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article6773.htm


Since most of us are pretty woefully ill-informed about Iraqi politics, Islam, Shi'ism, etc., we should at least have another perspective to counter-balance the knee-jerk Sadr-bashing. So, take a minute to read the brief op-ed piece linked above.

Islamism has its atrocious sides (at least in its Saudi fascist form, very much created in tandem with the US). But it also has a lot of positives, primarily when it comes to social welfare. Sadr is fighting for his religion, to be sure, but he is fighting against neo-con free-market anti-labor corporate fascism, Bush and Bremer style. (see my post in this forum "CORPWATCH: IRAQ: Labor Upsurge Wins Support from U.S. UNIONS)

Read Sayyid Qutb's "Social Justice in Islam" (amazon.com). He's the intellectual father of "radical Islam"--and it is not by chance that he moved in this direction after spending several years as a grad student in the US. He does engage in some naive West-bashing, but he does present an attractive vision of Islamic society. It's not about the tyranny of the clergy, but about providing for the poor and helpless.

P.S., Juan Cole is undoubtedly an authority, but politically (despite his commendable Bush-bashing) he is moderate. If he thinks that Sadr is "radical," he probably would think the same about many DUers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 11:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. agree
and he's a fundamentalist. So what. He believes something different than we do. We've got the right to tell him or his people what to think? We've got the right to tell him how to run his country? We've got the right to take away his self-determination?

Where did we get that right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC