Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Guardian: So, what's next for CNN?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
MinM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-12 08:22 AM
Original message
Guardian: So, what's next for CNN?
So, what's next for CNN?

CNN founder Ted Turner in 1996, shortly before he was forced out. Photograph: Adam Nadel/AP

Even CNN's outgoing chief Jim Walton isn't sure about its future. What, if anything, could possibly put the channel back on track?

Michael Wolff

After way too many years, last week CNN got rid of its long time CEO Jim Walton. Even Walton who bills the leave-taking as his own decision seemed to acknowledge in his departing remarks CNN's lack of direction, and his own failure to alter that course. Actually, it would be hard to offer a more dismal appraisal of one's own tenure. Walton's message: you really, really need someone else.

But the problem with CNN is not just uninspired leadership and lack of vision. In fact, what Walton is really saying is: good riddance, nobody can fix it.

Because what's wrong with CNN is what's wrong with Time Warner, its owner. And what's wrong with CNN is what's wrong with television news. And even if you acknowledge what's wrong with it, that does not mean that there is any real upside in fixing it.

When it agreed to be acquired by Time Warner in 1995, Turner Broadcasting, the parent of CNN, was arguably the most innovative company in the media business. It was the revolution in cable television and in 24-hour news. CNN was the Twitter of its day, reinventing the culture, methods and expectations of news. I'm not sure it is possible to overstate how much Ted Turner and his satellite delivery system, plus his non-network style, up-ended the business.

Time Warner, for its part, was the Apple of 1995 at least in terms of reach, influence, power and relative oppressiveness. The 1989 merger of the cut-throat Ivy Leaguers at Time, Inc and the killer Hollywood quasi-mobsters at Warner Communications had produced the biggest, fiercest, hungriest media company on earth a mega-organism of considerable brains and even greater ferocity (they were even more ferocious with each other than they were with outsiders)...

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/aug/01/cnn...

Could Keith Olbermann save CNN could CNN save Keith Olbermann?
Refresh | +1 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-12 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
1. Bring on Keith Olbermann! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
lbrtbell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-05-12 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. At one time, I would have believed in KO
But he has revealed himself to be too incapable of working well with others, to do anything but go down in flames. Truly a shame, for someone with that much talent to sabotage his own talent this way. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-12 02:27 AM
Response to Original message
2. How about dumping the hundreds of political hacks they have on the network
And use the money to pay journalists and reporters instead of self-important people like Howard Kurtz.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 23rd 2014, 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC