Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

John Paul Stevens: Bush Appeal to the Supreme Court was Frivolous

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Stuart G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-11 09:25 AM
Original message
John Paul Stevens: Bush Appeal to the Supreme Court was Frivolous
Edited on Tue Oct-11-11 09:28 AM by Stuart G
Huffington Post:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/10/10/john-paul-stevens-bush_n_1003907.html


Former Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens writes in his new memoir, Five Chiefs, that the George W. Bush campaign's 2000 appeal to the United States Supreme Court over the Florida recount was "frivolous" and never should have been granted.

He recalls bumping into Justice Stephen Breyer at a Christmas party and the two having a brief conversation about the Bush application to halt the recount by issuing a stay. "We agreed that the application was frivolous," he writes. "To secure a stay, a litigant must show that one is necessary to prevent a legally cognizable irreparable injury. Bush's attorneys had failed to make any such showing."

By a five-to-four vote, the court granted the stay. "What I still regard as a frivolous stay application kept the court extremely busy for four days," he writes. He adds that no justice has ever cited the opinions that provided the basis for their ruling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
lector Donating Member (61 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-11 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
1. Yea right
But it didn't stop them did it ? Ever wonder why ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-11 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
2. Of All the Infamous Supreme Court Rulings --
Dred Scott, Plessy v. Ferguson, etc -- Bush v. Gore is the one with the least foundation in law. Regardless of the moral implications, you could make a reasonable case based on law that slaves, being property, could be transported over state lines, or that separate does not necessarily mean unequal.

The Bush v Gore decision is utterly baseless. It puts the entire American judicial process in a bad light.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-11 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
3. And we will never be the same.
Didn't Sandra Day O'Connor say she regrets her vote? What a travesty the whole thing was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DirkGently Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-11 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
4. The country stolen right in front of us. Not hyperbole. Fact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Citizen Worker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-11 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. And we sat idly by and did nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DirkGently Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-11 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Yes, but the theft isn't over. Nor the opportunity to act.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-11 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
5. It was a judicial coup and we will be suffering the consequences of that
catastrophically, corrupted decision for decades if not longer.

Thanks for the thread, Stuart G.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libinnyandia Donating Member (526 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-11 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
7. election 2000
It all would have been prevented if progressives hadn't been divided in 2000. If Nader hadn't got 20000 votes in NH, Florida would have been irrelevant
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zoeisright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-11 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
9. No shit, Sherlock.
That was a coup. Period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benld74 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-11 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
10. Like the pidgeon says COUP,COUP COUP,,,,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC