Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Washington Post Sunday editorial: Encouraging whistleblowers

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
alp227 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 07:16 PM
Original message
Washington Post Sunday editorial: Encouraging whistleblowers
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/encouraging-whistleblowers/2011/05/16/AFl9mf8G_story.html

DANIEL KIRK suspected that his employer, Schindler Elevator Corp., had defrauded the federal government by falsifying or failing to file documents about the military veterans on its payroll. The company could be denied payment if it failed to meet this annual requirement; Mr. Kirk, a Vietnam vet and a manager who dealt with personnel issues, believed that the company was skirting the law.

To substantiate his claims, Mr. Kirk, through his wife, filed several Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests with the Labor Department to obtain forms filled out by Schindler. He said the documents showed that Schindler had failed to file the mandatory forms for several years and had entered erroneous information on those it did file. Mr. Kirk filed suit against Schindler in 2005.

The FOIA request would prove to be fatal to his cause. In a 5 to 3 decision on Monday, with Justice Elena Kagan taking no part, the Supreme Court concluded that the forms obtained by Mr. Kirk undercut his ability to sue Schindler under the False Claims Act.

(...)

What does not make sense is the court’s decision to label administrative forms filled out by the suspect company as “reports” even though they contained only raw information that had not been audited, analyzed or investigated by the government or any outside entity. The decision could prevent legitimate whistleblowers from moving forward with their cases. Corporate insiders are often essential in ferreting out fraudulent contracting practices.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
saras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yes, but the administration (and much of DU) hates whistleblowing traitors
Why on earth would we want to encourage them? They only make it hard to do business without attracting unpleasant attention from the public.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Citizen Worker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 11:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. No doubt the court's decision was made with an eye cast in the direction of justice Thomas and his
failure to disclose his wife's earned income from right wing sources for the last 20 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 02:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC