Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Beat Goes On

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Daveparts still Donating Member (614 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-08-09 09:12 AM
Original message
The Beat Goes On
The Beat Goes On
By David Glenn Cox

Last week I wrote about former Clinton Chief of Staff and co-transition Chairman John Podesta who floated the idea of a Value Added Tax. This week the idea was brought up again by none other than Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi. In Washington this is called a trial balloon, run it up the flagpole and see who salutes or shoots at it, whatever the case may be.

The Value Added Tax has been the darling of the far right wing for a generation; it is a part of their flat tax scenario. Their twisted logic is as follows: you only pay taxes when you purchase something, and since wealthy people have more money, they will pay more taxes. Except…except that as a percentage of their income the tax falls the hardest on those with the least. It puts you and John McCain in the same tax bracket, you and Nancy Pelosi in the same tax bracket.

It’s not that they are bad people, it is that they are ignorant people. They are ignorant of the world in which most of us live. Our senators and congress people are for the most part multimillionaires. John Kerry has a net worth estimated at over $200 million, and when Kerry was a returning Vietnam vet with only a few coins in his pocket he passionately pleaded with Congress to discontinue the Vietnam War. Now Kerry feels differently, co-authoring legislation to expand US efforts in Pakistan to the tune of seven and half billion dollars.

Nancy Pelosi is worth over $25 million and so doesn’t feel that a value-added tax would be such a bad thing after all. Just as they don’t understand your world, most of us don’t understand theirs. When you have a net worth of $25 million, you just buy whatever you want. These people don’t sit in the dealership waiting for their credit to be approved. They pick out the car they want and write a check. Bob and Elizabeth Dole list a money market and checking account containing over one million dollars. How’s that compare to your checking account?

They don’t clean the house; they don’t wash cars or mow the lawn. Many of them don’t even drive cars. They have a limo to pick them up and take them wherever they want to go. John McCain was criticized during the Presidential campaign for not knowing how many homes he owned. McCain would not be alone; Richard Shelby of Alabama owns medical buildings and a home in Tuscaloosa valued at over one million dollars. Alabama real estate is not California real estate; a one million-dollar home in Tuscaloosa is a pretty nice spread.

If you hold assets worth $25 million and manage just a 5% return on investments, that’s $1.25 million annually. Guess what, you don’t pay value-added taxes on investments. As Cartman would say, “Sweet!”

It’s not class warfare as much as it's class identification; they don’t live in your world and you don’t live in theirs. It’s no wonder that Barack Obama gets treated so badly on Capitol Hill. With a net worth under a million dollars even he doesn’t travel in their circles. An exclusive retreat in Colorado required members to have a net worth in excess of $25 million before they could apply for membership. Bill Clinton was granted a special dispensation because he was a former President. Now Clinton can enter on his own power, having a net worth of over $30 million.

I’m not exempting the Republicans. When they were in power I said the same about them when they tried to pass regressive taxes on working people. I recently took Megan McCain to task for lamenting about how hard it was to be Megan McCain. She graduated from Columbia two years ago, and had she not been the daughter of a multimillionaire senator would she have ever been admitted in the first place? Do you think she gets nasty letters wanting payment of her student loans? There are no loans, there are no financial aid forms to fill out. Daddy or his accountant just writes the check.

When George W. Bush found yet another oil company flat broke he didn’t pick up the want ads. He bought a job as the managing partner of the Texas Rangers. His name recognition was all the qualification he needed. It didn’t matter that he knew less about baseball than he did about the oil business, he was his daddy's namesake and that was good enough.

Close your eyes and try to imagine, a million dollars in your checking account and all your homes paid for and anything you want just a phone call away. Your parties are catered and for fun you fly to Hawaii for the weekend. You go skiing in Aspen and watch the Super Bowl from a skybox. Like Condi Rice you go shopping for shoes in New York and you try to keep it under twenty thousand dollars.

It’s no wonder that they can’t understand why people would be upset that you would vote to limit insurance company liability to 65%. They think, “Why the hell don’t you just pay the rest yourself?” That’s why House whip Eric Canter is such a staunch opponent of student loans. His mommy and daddy paid for his college tuition and he thinks that yours should too. Now he’s in favor of vouchers so that people can choose to send their children to private schools. But don’t you think for a second that your kids could get into the private schools he attended. Not even if they could play football.

Theirs is a pampered life of leisure; they live to work, they don’t work to live. They don’t worry about retirement or whether the roof will start leaking again or if the old furnace will make it through the winter. They never have to worry about buying the kids clothes for the school year or what they will do if their child gets sick. They’ve got health insurance and don’t drive clunkers and so don’t need cash for them.

Mileage is a meaningless term, as is coach. They don’t shop for groceries; they send someone to shop and get what’s on the list because money is no object and never was any object. They don’t work for you because they don’t understand you or your little problems. Chronic depression? Go to the emergency room. Lose your house? Gee, that’s tough but capitalism’s not perfect.

We are locked out of our government like we are locked out of the private schools. It takes millions of dollars to get elected and they’ve always got more, and friends that have more. As Harry Truman said, “They like the government so much they want to buy it!” Now they own it and we’re left shivering in the snow because they are utterly clueless to the plight of working Americans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
daleanime Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-08-09 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
1. Oh hell yea...
:argh: The question is how best to deal with it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zoeisright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-08-09 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Start taxing the hell out of them.
When Americans are dying because they can't afford basic health care, it is an affront to decency and morality that people with that much money are allowed to pay very little in taxes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleanime Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-08-09 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Sounds reasonable...
problem is, they own 'our' government-we need that back then let's address a little tax fairness. All I can see is education, but that's long term, need something now!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-08-09 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Yes. Investment income should be taxed as income.
There is no logical, ethical or reasonable argument for why unearned income is taxed as less then half the rate as earned income.

And close the loopholes. There is no good reason why most of the tax loopholes they keep creating are geared towards unearned income.

The reason they pay less in taxes and have all the tax loopholes is purely because it benefits them as rich people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-08-09 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
4. K&R
There are still a handful of Democrats who work for us.
You can find them in the Progressive Caucus.
NONE of them were given a position of power in the Obama administration.

http://www.pdamerica.org/



"There are forces within the Democratic Party who want us to sound like kinder, gentler Republicans. I want us to compete for that great mass of voters that want a party that will stand up for working Americans, family farmers, and people who haven't felt the benefits of the economic upturn."---Paul Wellstone





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glowing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-08-09 11:10 PM
Response to Original message
6. There are a couple of options:
#1. complete revolution of the system, however, the United States has the most weapons and they have contracted mercenary corporations at their disposal.

#2. work from the local level. Place the most progressive persons in. It takes time, money, and lot's of work in creating an atmosphere at the local level in which people participate and pay attention.

#3. National Strike... This is NOT doing anything for at least a week. If people did not go to work or spend money and pulled their money out of all the big banks, all of our issues would be met.. This requires a massive PR campaign. It would take every progressive org. to advertise in any method afforded to them. This puts power in the hands of the many thru passive resistence. I think its the best method available. What is our employers going to do if nobody shows up to work, uses a bank, goes to the grocery store, flies or travels anywhere, buys anything, works for anyone. Is everyone going to be fired? NO. If everyone is on strike for a week or even 3 days, this country and the world would shut down. It would be difficult because support systems would not be functioning like police and paramedics and doctors.. so it is difficult to maintain for a long time. Unless, it was planned pre-strike as to which persons would still provide basic levels of support in these necessary areas.. I'm assuming babies and emergencies wouldn't take a back seat to a National Strike. The biggest thing we could do for ourselves would be to pull our money out of the big banks. BoA, WellsFargo, Chase... They absolutely fear a bank run. Its the reason all the pols go on tv and say "your money is safe even if there is a bank failure; no reason to pull your money out". These banks do not have enough capital to provide all of its users the ability to close their accounts all at the same time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-09-09 12:04 AM
Response to Original message
7. When we allowed our govt. to tax our labor they lost all
sense of ethics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pokercat999 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-09-09 06:55 AM
Response to Original message
8. It will eventually come down to:
Edited on Fri Oct-09-09 06:55 AM by pokercat999
They will give up their silver or they will take our lead! At least that's how it will go if the poor RW ever figures out they're being punked by the rich..........never mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 04:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC