Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why It Might Be Healthier to Sleep Alone

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-12-09 07:28 AM
Original message
Why It Might Be Healthier to Sleep Alone
via AlterNet:



Why It Might Be Healthier to Sleep Alone

By Sara Ost, EcoSalon. Posted September 12, 2009.

From the marriage sucks file: The couple that snoozes together, loses together. scientists say sleeping together ruins your health.




And we’re not talking about that kind of sleeping together. The couple that snoozes together, loses together. Or rather, the couple that sleeps together, doesn’t.

That’s the latest finding from British scientist Neil Stanley. While American science reporting tends to focus on banishing the endemic muffin top, our friends across the pond have a none-too-wee fixation with la difference. If it’s not a breakthrough study finding that those helpless men are distracted by breasts or are just distracted in general, it’s the juicy promise of death by nuptial that keeps the html dot uk flowing.

Marriage is depressing. Marriage is expensive. Marriage not only ruins your waking life, your night life and your sex life, it also ruins the part of your life you’re not even consciously participating in. Oh, for heaven’s sake, is there no rest for the wedded weary?

The study reports that if you’re shacked up and sharing a bed, you experience 50% more sleep troubles than singletons. Sleeping together is downright unhealthy. So weird – I’m not married for this exact reason! Strategic brilliance from Ost, yet again.

My properly chilled Scandinavian grandparents may have been onto something with their separate sleeping arrangements. As a child, I remember thinking it was sort of weird that Grandpa and Grandma had a bedroom like Lucy and Ricky’s since we weren’t living in black and white anymore, but then being glad for it because it made jumping on the bed(s) twice as fun! ...........(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.alternet.org/sex/142576/why_it_might_be_healthier_to_sleep_alone/




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-12-09 07:37 AM
Response to Original message
1. Just the opposite in my situation.
My SO has trouble sleeping alone and sleeps much more soundly when we're together.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enlightenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-12-09 08:54 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. But do you?
Or do you know your SO is sleeping soundly because you're lying there awake?

*teasing* :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-12-09 07:39 AM
Response to Original message
2. Hah! Some of us don't have any choice
I've been banished from the bedroom for snoring after 47 years of marriage.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FormerDittoHead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-12-09 07:43 AM
Response to Original message
3. What a mish-mosh of happy-talk and antidotes. What was about your HEALTH?
Edited on Sat Sep-12-09 07:44 AM by FormerDittoHead
What starts out as practically a piece from Andy Rooney eventually points to the news item at:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/8245578.stm

...which refers to Dr Neil Stanley who sleeps alone and uses history and house sizes for his findings and then to another study by a sociologist (not a medical doctor) which uses only 40 couples.

They only forgot to use the word Cancer in the headline...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Myrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-12-09 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
5. Think about it:
... being able to sleep 'in your own bed' has usually been a sign of wealth - you can AFFORD 2 beds? Especially in the early 1900's when most working-class families were almost ridiculously poor. People were forced to sleep together (sometimes entire families) because there was only 1 bed.

I don't think its a sign of 'prudishness' to sleep separately (although I'm sure its mighty inconvenient for moments of spontaneous combustion), or a sign of 'unprudishness' to not sleep together.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC