Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Glenn Greenwald: The Scope -- and Dangers -- of GE's Control of NBC and MSNBC

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-03-09 04:44 PM
Original message
Glenn Greenwald: The Scope -- and Dangers -- of GE's Control of NBC and MSNBC
via CommonDreams:



Published on Monday, August 3, 2009 by Salon.com
The Scope -- and Dangers -- of GE's Control of NBC and MSNBC

by Glenn Greenwald


I want to return to the subject of GE's silencing of Keith Olbermann both because there are new facts I've obtained that shed light on what happened here and because this is one of the most blatant examples yet of pernicious corporate control over America's journalism. The most striking aspect of this episode is that GE isn't even bothering any longer to deny the fact that they exert control over MSNBC's journalism. They've brazenly dispensed with the long-held fiction of the sanctity of journalistic independence from interference by the corporate parents that own America's largest news organizations.

Instead, GE is now openly and proudly boasting of their editorial control over the news organizations they own, and publicly rubbing it in the faces of NBC News journalists that they're subservient to GE's corporate agenda. Look at this smug, creepy quote from GE executive spokesman Gary Sheffer explaining in The New York Times why GE issued its gag order preventing Olbermann from criticizing Fox and O'Reilly, all but mocking NBC and MSNBC journalists as nothing more than GE's office of corporate spokespeople:

"We all recognize that a certain level of civility needed to be introduced into the public discussion," Gary Sheffer, a spokesman for G.E., said this week. "We’re happy that has happened."


Why is GE even speaking for MSNBC's editorial decisions at all? Needless to say, GE doesn't care in the slightest about "civility" in general. Mika Brzezinski can spout that people who dislike Sarah Palin aren't "real Americans" and Chris Matthews can say about George Bush that "everybody sort of likes the president, except for the real whack-jobs," and GE executives won't (and didn't) bat an eye. What they mean by "civility" is: "thou shalt not criticize anyone who can harm GE's business interests or who will report on our actions." Thus: GE's journalists will stop reporting critically on Fox and its top assets because Fox can expose actions of GE that we want to keep concealed. ...........(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.commondreams.org/view/2009/08/03-11




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-03-09 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-03-09 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. The parent corporations of the corporate media should be divested of their news divisions, they've
betrayed the public trust.

Thanks for the thread, marmar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tutankhamun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-03-09 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Yet most Americans still get their news amost exclusively from TV.
Which is why they will look at you like you're crazy if you mention the corporate influence in he MSM. "You crazy conspiracy theorist."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bozita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 01:26 AM
Response to Original message
4. kicking for Glenn Greenwald
Edited on Tue Aug-04-09 01:27 AM by Bozita
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
5. Kick...he makes good points. People often forget who pays the salaries
of even those folks we like at MSNBC..and we forget how quickly folks can be turned when they need to make a living. It could happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
6. This article is bullshit.
Keith has publically stated that there is no such deal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bertman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
7. Keith was always "civil". It was O'Reilly the asshat who wasn't civil.
Rec.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC