Donate to DU!
Democratic Underground Latest Threads
Latest
Greatest Threads
Greatest
Lobby
Lobby
Journals
Journals
Search
Search
Options
Options
Help
Help
Login
Login
Google

Killing for Fun and Profit

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
First thread | Last thread
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
Daveparts Donating Member (854 posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Sun Jun-14-09 10:05 AM
Original message
Killing for Fun and Profit
Killing for Fun and Profit
By David Glenn Cox


The Department of Homeland Security has upped its threat level. Agents are scouring the country in search of dangerous right wing extremists. For the second time in two weeks, Americans have been gunned down in the peaceful pursuit of their lives.

Bad men, crazy people, everywhere! Extremists, God help us!

Bloomberg reports a U.S. District Court Judge has allowed law suits to move forward against Eli Lilly, the drug company is accused of selling and encouraging physicians to prescribe the drug Zyprexa for uses never proven or approved by the FDA. It’s called off-labeling; it is used to goose profits by expanding a drug's target population by pushing its effectiveness against symptoms rather than illness.

In 1995, clinical trials of Zyprexa showed that the drug was ineffective in treating dementia in older patients. The only FDA-approved use of Zyprexa is in the treatment of schizophrenia, and that would have relegated Zyprexa to the backwaters of the pharmaceutical rivers. In the seven studies Lilly presented to the FDA, it was shown the Zyprexa had absolutely no benefit whatsoever in the treatment of dementia or Alzheimer’s.

But hey, this is America; it's all just a matter of marketing. We have wars to keep you safe from people who live in mud huts. And campaigns to keep a Muslim country from getting nuclear power when it’s surrounded by countries that do have nuclear power. It’s not what they do; it's what we say they will do.

Last year Zyprexa was Lilly’s most profitable drug, racking up $4.7 billion in sales. God bless America, only in America (patriotic music here) could a drug totally ineffective at what it is being prescribed for become number one in sales!

The judge released 10,000 pages of documents that tell a tale of for-profit medicine as cold and calculating as robbing the fillings from a corpse. Revealed was a 2002 business plan encouraging sales reps to press doctors to prescribe the drug to elderly patients for insomnia and mood swings. Ironically, one of the suggested symptoms to treat was suspicion.

Lilly marketed the drug to primary care physicians and long-term care facilities. Ever seeking to expand the market they added the treatment to post traumatic stress disorder and sleep difficulties. By 2006 Lilly executives were rolling in cash and the company's goal was $6 billion in sales. In 2002, Lilly researcher Peter Feldman sent E-mails to his boss Denice Torres, the company's global marketing director.

He said that they were going to stop studying Zyprexa’s potential health benefits for elderly consumers. That would risk “killing the goose that lays the golden eggs to save on poultry feed costs,” Feldman said in the unsealed messages.

Ha ha, nothing better than a comic researcher, is there? Except maybe an all-business marketing director. “Elderly remains an important aspect of target PT and affiliate focus,” Torres answered in the message.

“For two consecutive years, you have been on top and have turned in above-plan performance,” Grady Grant, Lilly’s national sales director, wrote to his salespeople in the newsletter.

“Once again you have all shown that (LTC) long term care is a driving force for Zyprexa in the US affiliate in 2002,” Mike Murray, another Lilly executive, wrote in the newsletter. “We must continue to accelerate the growth of Zyprexa.”

A nice pat on the head from the boss man and fat sales commissions can do wonders for sales

One sales representative wrote in a March 7, 2003, note that she’d persuaded a doctor to write Zyprexa prescriptions for use in “elderly pts, help sleep and irritability.” Another asked a doctor to try Zyprexa “in elderly who are not thinking clearly and are suspicious and hostile,” according to an Aug. 31, 2001, note.

Only in America could not thinking clearly and being suspicious and hostile be considered a symptom! Using that logic you could drug most of this society. But were this just a case of selling sugar pills to Granny and Boom Pa it could be forgiven. America’s shelves are full of medicines and pseudo medicines and treatments and supplements that at best might help a little, and at worst might deplete your wallet. But Zyprexa kills. Deaths for those taking Zyprexa were “significantly greater than placebo-treated patients (3.5 percent v. 1.5 percent, respectively).”

Now take $4.7 billion in annual sales and do the death math. But hey, they were making money, right? So who goes to jail? Go to jail? Why, nobody's going to jail, now or ever! This isn’t about wild-eyed extremists filled with hate and rage answering God’s call to kill. This is about nice capitalists in nice three-piece suits and ties killing the elderly for fun and profit. Illegally and immorally pushing a drug knowing full well in advance that it was dangerous and without any benefit to the patient.

Jail? No, this is America; we just want our money back. Only bad men, extremists and wild-eyed fanatics go to jail.

Lilly has already paid out $1.2 billion for 32,000 individual claims; the company faces further lawsuits by twelve states seeking damages. The company agreed in January to pay $1.4 billion to thirty states and this total included a $615 million fine levied by the federal government. Damages from pending lawsuits could reach another $6.8 billion, but with sales of $4 billion a year for seven years there is little monetary loss for the company.

““Plaintiffs are releasing one-sided, cherry-picked documents obtained in discovery to selected news media in an effort to try their cases in the media,” said Lilly spokeswoman Marni Lemons, who added that the company will fight the lawsuit.

From a Lily sales memo from 2001: “With most customers, we will continue to address the diabetes concern only when it arises. Get back to selling!”

Go to jail? Don’t be ridiculous, no one is going to jail. Only bad men, extremists and wild-eyed fanatics go to jail. This is just doing business in America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
   Replies to this thread
   If I was President, I'd nationalize all their patents then give the drugs away for free.  Joanne98   Jun-14-09 12:11 PM   #1 
   sounds similar with Vioxx and Merck  DemReadingDU   Jun-15-09 02:50 PM   #2 
   "as cold and calculating as robbing the fillings from a corpse. "  bertman   Jun-15-09 03:04 PM   #3 
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Sun Jun-14-09 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. If I was President, I'd nationalize all their patents then give the drugs away for free.

I'd write a Presidential Order to make them go to court to stop it.

It would be really really fun!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemReadingDU Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Jun-15-09 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
2. sounds similar with Vioxx and Merck

Vioxx was withdrawn years ago because many people died or had heart attacks. Merck set aside lots of money for the lawsuits.

Maybe that's why drugs are so expensive, in case people die, the price is built-in.

;(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bertman Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Jun-15-09 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
3. "as cold and calculating as robbing the fillings from a corpse. "
What's wrong with robbing fillings from a corpse? They aren't gonna need them anymore.

Recommend this OP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Nov 23rd 2009, 12:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals  |  Links  |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2009 Democratic Underground, LLC