Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Staying in Iraq

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-04 09:03 PM
Original message
Staying in Iraq
Staying in Iraq
By William Rivers Pitt
t r u t h o u t | Perspective

Tuesday 06 April 2004

http://truthout.org/docs_04/040604A.shtml

These are the numbers out of Iraq: 616 American soldiers killed, 18,000 medical evacuations of wounded American soldiers, 102 non-American coalition soldiers killed, more than 10,000 Iraqi civilians killed, somewhere in the neighborhood of $200 billion spent. There are no numbers available for the Iraqi civilians wounded.

These are the numbers out of the Bush White House, first put forward by George W. Bush in his 2003 State of the Union Address and which remain even today on the White House website: 26,000 liters of anthrax in Iraq, 38,000 liters of botulinum toxin in Iraq, 500 tons of sarin and mustard and VX gas in Iraq, 500 tons being 1,000,000 pounds, along with 30,000 munitions to deliver these agents. None of this, not one little bit of it, has been found.

This White House webpage, titled 'Disarm Saddam Hussein,' which parrots Bush's 2003 speech, likewise claims that Iraq is seeking uranium from Niger for use in a nuclear weapons program. It claims, as Bush did in his speech, that Iraq possesses mobile biological weapons labs. It claims, as Bush did in his speech, that Iraq enjoyed an operational relationship with al Qaeda terrorists during the rule of Saddam Hussein. The Niger claims were proven to be an embarrassing lie, the mobile weapons labs were revealed to be weather balloon launching platforms sold to Iraq by the British during the Reagan era, and no proof whatsoever has been put forth to establish a connection between Hussein and al Qaeda.

This is what the numbers say: Every reason put forth to justify the invasion of Iraq has been proven to be either a wretched exaggeration or an out-and-out fabrication. The number of dead and wounded in the American invasion of Iraq is appalling, and the amount of money we have spent and will continue to spend on this misadventure is staggering. It was White House spokesman Ken Adelman who said on December 6, 2001 in a CNN interview, "I don't agree that you need an enormous number of American troops. Saddam's army is down to one-third than it was before, and I think it would be a cakewalk." It has been anything but.

Because the Bush administration has gone out of their way to block media access to Dover Air Force base where American casualties are brought home from Iraq, because the Bush administration has gone out of their way to block media access to Walter Reed hospital in Washington and Fort Stewart in Georgia where thousands of badly wounded American soldiers have been convalescing after coming home from Iraq, because the Pentagon has changed the term 'body bag' to 'transfer tube,' because of all this and more, many Americans are not fully aware of how dangerous it is to be an American in Iraq.

...more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Daisey Mae Donating Member (654 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-04 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. I imagine that * blunders won't stop.
He will stay there with our troops (while his yellow ass is half way around the world ) He has no fear and no sense otherwise he could see what is coming as a result of his folly.... but he can"t and he won"t and many more will die and be horrifically disfigured and crippled from this ignoramus's lack of sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Martin Eden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-04 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. The international community will rescue us?
Even if president Kerry manages to undo most of the diplomatic damage inflicted by Bush, and convinces the international community -- by relinquishing all claims and authority in Iraq -- that all nations have a common interest in a stable, peaceful Iraq -- what are the real chances that other countries will send their troops into this meat grinder?

Obviously we have to make every effort to bring some legitimacy to this situation, and it is doubtful the U.S. military presence in Iraq will ever be considered legitimate by the Arab world, but I have my doubts that we can convince others to commit troops.

I may be wrong; I hope I am.

It just seems to me that this situation may already be beyond repair.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bpilgrim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-04 11:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. UPDATE: We abandon Afghanistan in the summer of 2002
AGAIN.

the only way this bloodletting can end is to let THEM run their OWN COUNTRY.

we should make them KEEP their promise to let them have a VOICE in their 'gov'

maybe i'm just an old fashioned american...

vietnam hasn't turned out as bad as the doomsayers and soothsayers of the BEST and the BRIGHTEST of our fathers genration were clinging to in the bitter end.

peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC