Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush lawyer directs Rove not to talk

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
katty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 06:40 PM
Original message
Bush lawyer directs Rove not to talk
more: http://www.newsweek.com/id/182240

Just four days before he left office, President Bush instructed former White House aide Karl Rove to refuse to cooperate with future congressional inquiries into alleged misconduct during his administration.

On Jan. 16, 2009, then White House Counsel Fred Fieldingsent a letter to Rove's lawyer, Robert Luskin. The message: should his client receive any future subpoenas, Rove "should not appear before Congress" or turn over any documents relating to his time in the White House. The letter told Rove that President Bush was continuing to assert executive privilege over any testimony by Rove—even after he leaves office.

A nearly identical letter was also sent by Fielding the day before to a lawyer for former White House counsel Harriet Miers, instructing her not to appear for a scheduled deposition with the House Judiciary Committee. That letter reasserted the White House position that Miers has "absolute immunity" from testifying before Congress about anything she did while she worked at the White House—a far-reaching claim that is being vigorously disputed by lawyers for the House of Representatives in court.

The letters set the stage for what is likely to be a highly contentious legal and political battle over an unresolved issue: whether a former president can assert "executive privilege"—and therefore prevent his aides from testifying before Congress—even after his term has expired.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wtbymark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. Jail - period! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
2. too late
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spartan61 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
3. If the bush admin is so innocent, as they claim,
why are they going to such lengths to keep everything so secretive?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. What do they have to hide?????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
santamargarita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. Everything they did for eight years
~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. It was a rhetorical question laced with irony. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texastoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
4. Why? What could they possibly be hiding?
Bunch of pussies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Bunch of mobsters engaged in an ongoing criminal conspiracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. yup
They continue to hide from the law. I can't imagine how these post-administration claims of exec. priv. could have ANY legal underpinnings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
8. Or what?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
9. Looks like Fieldingsent is involved in a conspiracy to obstruct justice
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Left Coast2020 Donating Member (597 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-09 02:04 AM
Response to Reply #9
14. And if thats what he told them, he could lose his law license.
Its called "DISBARMENT"!!! And any attorney that gives that kind of advice could be disbared.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salguine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
10. This pussyfooting around with this asshole needs to stop, like fucking yesterday. Kick in
Edited on Thu Jan-29-09 07:20 PM by salguine
his fucking door at five in the morning, drag his fat ass out of bed, throw it in the back of a squad car, and chain his ass to a chair in front of the House Judiciary Committee, still in his fucking jammies. If he doesn't talk, waterboard his fat ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Left Coast2020 Donating Member (597 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-09 02:06 AM
Response to Reply #10
16. They will. They just want to make him squirm and freak out a little.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benld74 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
13. Executive Privilege is another name for a Bushco Smokescreen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
classysassy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-09 02:05 AM
Response to Original message
15. The mob
still trying to exert power after they are out of office,and for awhile out of jail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 02:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC