Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Jim Lobe: Perle Explains (Another neocon explains, again, how it wasn't him)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
laststeamtrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-07-09 05:11 AM
Original message
Jim Lobe: Perle Explains (Another neocon explains, again, how it wasn't him)
Perle Explains
Jim Lobe

Dont miss Richard Perles comprehensive but remarkably unpersuasive explanation in The National Interest Online of how neo-conservatives, least of all himself, really exercised very little influence over the Bush administrations policies, even in the run-up to the Iraq invasion. Actually, you wont find much of what he writes particularly new, and, if you were hoping for some insider insights, or even interesting personal anecdotes about his chairmanship of the Defense Policy Board, friendship with Dick Cheney, or how he persuaded Rumsfeld to hire Paul Wolfowitz as his deputy and Douglas Feith as his number three, there really arent any. In many ways, the article is a rehash of his complaints about the State Department and the CIA in the book he wrote with David Frum, An End to Evil, and an unenlightening condensation of Feiths remarkably poorly received War and Decision.

In several of my first posts (here, here and here) on this blog, I cited examples of Perles propensity for historical revisionism, but I was particularly struck in his latest effort by his assertion, I know of no statement, public or private by any neoconservative in or near government, advocating the invasion of Iraq primarily for the purpose of of promoting democracy or advancing some grand neoconservative vision. He dismisses the notion as well that neoconservatives may have promoted war with Iraq in hopes of bolstering what they thought were Israels interests.

I would just refer him to two letters drafted by Bill Kristol and signed by him, among many other neoconservatives close to the administration, and sent to the president under the auspices of the Project for the New American Century (PNAC) which, in fact, did lay out a grand neoconservative vision for the region, one based on the conviction that Israels and U.S. enemies in the Middle East are one and the same and that Israels fight against terrorism is our fight. The first letter was published on September 20, 2001, and lays out the step-by-step blueprint for how the war on terror should be fought, including, of course, the necessity of ousting Saddam Hussein whether or not he was involved in the 9/11 attacks (although Perle, in his interactions with the media, never missed an opportunity to suggest that Saddam was indeed involved) followed by appropriate measures of retaliation against Iran and Syria if they did not end their support for Hezbollah. The second letter, published April 3, 2002, calls for breaking all ties with Yasser Arafat and for accelerating plans to remove Saddam as the first step toward realizing a renewed commitment on our part, as you suggested in your State of the Union address, to the birth of freedom and democratic government in the Islamic world. If those two letters (which, of course, echoed the arguments made by the hawks within the administration) didnt constitute statements advocating the invasion of Iraq primarily for the purpose of of promoting democracy or advancing some grand neoconservative vision, its hard to know what would.

Its what I wrote for tompaine.com back in 2004: Chutzpah: Thy Name is Perle.... http://www.ips.org/blog/jimlobe/?p=214
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC