Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Eugene Robinson: Regret-Me-Not; Bush tries to rewrite history

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-08 12:14 PM
Original message
Eugene Robinson: Regret-Me-Not; Bush tries to rewrite history
Regret-Me-Not
By Eugene Robinson
Friday, December 5, 2008; Page A25

Remember that long-ago news conference when George W. Bush couldn't think of any mistakes he had made? Unbelievably, he still can't.

When ABC's Charles Gibson, interviewing Bush at Camp David, asked the president what one "do-over" he'd like to have, this was Bush's reply:

"I don't know -- the biggest regret of all the presidency has to have been the intelligence failure in Iraq. A lot of people put their reputations on the line and said the weapons of mass destruction is a reason to remove Saddam Hussein. It wasn't just people in my administration; a lot of members in Congress, prior to my arrival in Washington, D.C., during the debate on Iraq; a lot of leaders of nations around the world were all looking at the same intelligence. And, you know, that's not a do-over, but I wish the intelligence had been different, I guess."

Fellow sufferers from Bush Derangement Syndrome, mind your blood pressure. Just seven more weeks. Hang in there, because there are two more snippets from the interview that I have to quote.

When Gibson asked whether there would have been an Iraq war if Bush had known that Hussein had no WMDs, Bush replied: "You know, that's an interesting question. That is a do-over that I can't do. It's hard for me to speculate." And when Gibson asked Bush to name his greatest accomplishment, he got this response: "I keep recognizing we're in a war against ideological thugs and keeping America safe."

Observe the astounding selectivity of the president's memory. Just imagine all the do-overs he could have asked for....

***

Bush spoke of having liberated Iraqis from the savage rule of a tyrant -- which is true, but that wasn't the reason we were originally told we had to go to war. The president spoke of having created a democracy in the heart of the Middle East, one that would shoot out tendrils of freedom to take root throughout the region -- which is a hard story to sell when the war's greatest geopolitical impact has been to strengthen theocratic Iran to the point that it dares to dream of ancient Persian glory.

Bush pats himself on the back for keeping his eye on the ball -- the "war against ideological thugs." But those ideological thugs are ensconced somewhere, probably in the lawless frontier territories of Pakistan, rebuilding their murderous networks and plotting new attacks. I'm betting that they don't regret Bush's decision to invade Iraq, either.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/20...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Martin Eden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-08 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. 2 things the Bush Bush history re-writers always leave out:
1) It wasn't just WMD -- it was the supposed alliance between Saddam and al Qaeda that Bush misled the public to believe when he constantly put Saddam, 9/11, and al Qaeda into the same context (often in the samew sentence) and with statements to the effect that Saddam would like to use al Qaeda as a "forward army" and you "can't distinguish" between the two in the war on terror. These were BOLD-FACED LIES. Our intelligence agencies were telling Bush the opposite.

2) There is a HUGH difference between assumptions made about WMD before the inspectors were readmitted to Iraq and what the inspectors were NOT finding when they had access to every site. They were already coming to the conclusion that the extensive infrastructure necessary for a nuclear weapons program simply didn't exist in the country, yet Darth Cheney continued to insist Iraq had "reconstituted" nuclear weapons.


Why didn't Bushco give the inspectors the time they were requesting to determine as a mstter of FACT whether or not the WMD existed?

Because if the inspectors were allowed to continue, the public rationale for this war would have evaporated along with the MUSHROOM CLOUDS we were told to fear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-08 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Thanks, ME -- excellent points! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seafan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-08 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. George W. Bush: Regret-Me-Not
In the past eight catastrophic years of lost lives, lost hope, lost scientific advancement, lost environment, lost national security, lost international reputation, one true adage of December 12, 2000 comes to mind:


Garbage in--- Garbage out.




Regret-Me-Not

By Eugene Robinson
Friday, December 5, 2008; A25


Remember that long-ago news conference when George W. Bush couldn't think of any mistakes he had made? Unbelievably, he still can't.

.....

Observe the astounding selectivity of the president's memory. Just imagine all the do-overs he could have asked for. He might regret not paying more attention to the Aug. 6, 2001, presidential daily briefing memo, which was titled "Bin Laden Determined to Strike in U.S." and reported "patterns of suspicious activity in this country consistent with preparations for hijackings or other types of attacks." He might wish he hadn't put the nation's emergency response capability in the hands of Michael Brown, a former executive of the International Arabian Horse Association, and then watched from afar as New Orleans drowned. The president might have volunteered, as he did in a previous interview, that his "Mission Accomplished" photo op on the deck of the USS Abraham Lincoln was a moment he'd like to have back.

But no. Instead, he told Gibson that his "biggest regret" was a mistake made by others: intelligence analysts who got it wrong about Iraq.

The only inference we can draw is that if the intelligence had been more skeptical of Hussein's WMD prowess, there might not have been an Iraq war. Bush's "hard for me to speculate" dodge notwithstanding, this seems to be the story the outgoing administration wants to tell. Karl Rove recently sounded this same revisionist theme, saying that "absent weapons of mass destruction" there probably would have been no invasion.

But there was plenty of skeptical intel about Iraq's alleged weapons of mass destruction, particularly its nuclear program -- the potential "mushroom cloud" that Condoleezza Rice so chillingly evoked. Shaky or ambiguous reports -- such as the bogus document about Iraq's attempt to buy yellowcake uranium ore in Niger -- were presented as gospel. International nuclear inspectors, meanwhile, were inside Iraq, doing their job.

There's another problem with the way Bush is trying to rewrite history. After U.S. forces combed Iraq for WMDs and established that none existed, the administration came up with other backdated rationales for the invasion. Vice President Cheney even kept insisting there was some link to Sept. 11 that only he could perceive; after a while, nobody paid him any attention.

.....




The destruction this one man has wrought is incalculable.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-08 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
4. Too bad Eugene won't be on TV with Keith tonight to expound
He and Krugman are the only opinionists who call out the repeated, calculated, and outrageous lies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Sep 01st 2014, 06:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC