Court to weigh question about Obama citizenship

[Fluffdaddy]

Unlikely decision could deny him presidency

Tom Ramstack (Contact)
Friday, December 5, 2008
The Supreme Court plans to meet Friday to decide whether to hear a case that could determine whether President-elect Barack Obama ever becomes the nation's president.

Justice Clarence Thomas picked up the petition to hear New Jersey attorney Leo Donofrio's lawsuit after it was denied by Justice David H. Souter. Justice Thomas referred it to the full court, which decided to distribute the case for the judges' conference



http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2008/dec/05/court-to-weigh-question-about-obama-citizenship/


Will the Right leaning Supreme Court steal another one from us?

[Richard D]

1. That would definitely be civil war

[Mist]

2. Perhaps the Supremes hope to put the whole silly "argument" to rest by

ruling on it. Wouldn't that then preclude any other court from having to rule on it?

[BrklynLiberal]

4. I have sincere doubts that is Clarence Thomas' motive for deciding to hear this

after Souter declined to hear it. Thomas is looking for blood.

[Sal Minella]

7. Clarence Thomas has said he doesn't care for being a Supreme Court Justice because "you can't make

any money at it." Maybe he has now found a way, been offered a way.

[BrklynLiberal]

13. Then why the hell doesn't he resign...on Jan 21st!!!!!

[Felix Mala]

32. It can never be put fully to rest... The wingnuts will use this ad nauseum

to negate every action Obama and his appointees make. They'll seek to nullify every law he signs and overturn every decision made by his court appointees. Rust never sleeps.

[BrklynLiberal]

3. What a f**kin crock of shit!!!! I cannot believe that ClarenceThomas can be allowed to pull this

crap!!!
I refuse to believe that the RWers on the SCOTUS would DARE to try to overturn this election!!!

Once again...I believe the pitchforks and torches are in the offing.

I will be at Lowe's tomorrow getting my pitchfork!!!

[Jackpine Radical]

5. I already own several pitchforks.

I think I will sharpen them.

[BrklynLiberal]

11. I will have mine at the ready just inside my door!!!

[Pab Sungenis]

31. They already overturned one in 2000.

What makes you think they will stop now?

[marshall]

6. I finally broke down and looked up the law they've been screeching about

The one that says a child born to a citizen and a non-citizen is a citizen if the citizen parent has lived in the US as a citizen for at least ten years, five of which must have been after the parent was 16 years old. Since Obama's mother was only 18 when he was born I thought that was their argument. But in reading the law this is only talking about children who are born OUTSIDE the US.

I really don't see any valid reason that Obama's parents and grandparents would enter into a conspiracy to conceal his birthplace. I'm sure the possibility of him growing up to become president of the US didn't even enter their minds, so what would be the value of trying to say he was born somehwere else. Maya was born in Indonesia and they had no problem with that, didn't try to fool the record keepers into thinking she was born in Hawaii.

The thing that keeps this going, other than the blind ignorance of those pushing it, is that a completely contemporaneous document has not been made public. I assume Obama has some reason for not making an original document public. At first I thought maybe it listed his parents as unmarried and he didn't want to throw that up for public discourse, but I've since read evidence that they were married in Hilo five months before he was born (and he makes no secret of this).

Now I wonder if perhaps the original 1961 document might list religion, and perhaps Obama Sr. had "Muslim" put on the document. If that were thrown on the world stage it would put President Obama in the awkward situation of "renoucning" a religion he never himself embraced, simply because there was such a caterwaul for him to proclaim himself a Christian during the election. This could be seen as an insult by Muslims, and especially the radical branches. It's just a guess on my part, but the possibility of backing him in a corner could be what is really at the root of this ridiculous movement.

[Crunchy Frog]

8. Well, if he's not a citizen, then I'm not either.

I don't for a minute think this will go anywhere, but if it were to, I would be absolutely finished with this country.

[Name removed]

9. Deleted message

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

[Fluffdaddy]

10. Welcome to DU. BTW: Nice first post................bye "ZOT"

[AuntPittyPat]

19. Does he have something to hide?

Otherwise, he should produce the long form birth certificate.

[Fluffdaddy]

20. Name another President-elect that had to show a birth certificate? Freeper

[Jim Sagle]

23. Eat my shit.

[acmavm]

26. Wow, isn't it a little early in the day for you to be so fucking lost?

You missed the turnoff apparently.

[MineralMan]

27. Did GWB show you his birth certificate?

Oh, I didn't think so.

[rpannier]

15. You left out the 'Sarcasm' smilie

I hope

[Crunchy Frog]

16. So that you folks will have something to build your conspiracy theories around

for the next 8 years.

[Fluffdaddy]

21. That's what they are trying to do.

[scytherius]

17. Want an answer to this one ya dumb Freeper? Here it is.

I was an atty for 30 years. I would advise him not to. Why? Two reasons:

1- This causes the enemy (and make no mistake YOU are the enemy) to burn up time and resources. It worked and worked well. It causes you to keep your eye off the ball AND makes you look like the lunatics you are;

2- The enemy wouldn't stop here. They would call the long form a forger and continue with their lawsuits and, once emboldened, would bring many many many more lawsuits on other issues. To produce more than he has would also encourage others to file lawsuits.

ANY lawyer with a brain knows that what you do is to fight the issue on the grounds of standing.

Obviously, you don't qualify.

What fools these Freepers be.

[pipi_k]

28. You mean, like

when George W Bush could have produced documents showing that he hadn't gone AWOL from the TANG before his service was up but he never did?

Did he have something to hide?

Like the fact that he managed to get himself a creampuff position in the TANG when a whole lot of his contemporaries were being sent into the deathtrap jungles of Vietnam to get their guts blown out, but he wasn't even man enough to FINISH what he swore in an oath to do...like flying planes over Texas?

Like that?

[Felix Mala]

33. The ignorazzi on the right keep moving the goal post....

First they wanted an "original" birth certificate. Then a "certified" birth certificate. Now it's a "long form" (sic) birth certificate. I haven't seen my "original" birth certificate since I was a child. On the two occasions I've needed one, I've gone to the health department who looked up my birth on microfiche records and printed out a new "copy" certified with the current date. I doubt if any state record offices, except in the Old South where birth records seem to be REALLY important, keeps originals around.

[scytherius]

12. This is meaningless, any of the judges would do this, and this is why

This is nothing more than a vote on whether or not to grant Cert in this case. ALL of the judges would have put this on for vote. It means NOTHING as far as the merits of the case. The SOLE issue is standing. Even if they do grant Cert it is ONLY on the issue of standing. That wouldn't be decided until next year. (I've argued before SCOTUS several times).

Let's suppose they then decide that there is standing. The merits of the case would go back to the District Court for adjudication and that would take YEARS.

What is great about all of this? It keeps those moron Freepers occupied. Look how ignorantly rabid they get:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2143232/posts

I mean, c'mon. These fools think that Palin is intelligent.

[BrklynLiberal]

14. Iguess you are right. The guy pushing this suit is probably in the same category as

those folks who wear aluminum foil on their heads so the aliens won't be able to read their minds.

[scytherius]

18. Exactly

And I am NO fan of Thomas. One of the worst judges ever. However, what he has done is mere formality.

[DUlover2909]

25. Obama is a lawyer and also very astute. I imagine he has this figured out already.

Let the freepers and wingnuts carry on all they want.

[scytherius]

29. You got it

I handled a myriad of constitutional matters and this is exactly the way to handle this. And, as you said, Obama and his crew figured this out from day one.

[AndyTiedye]

22. There are 4 on the Court Would Would Jump At the Chance to Hand Another Election to the Repigs

and a couple more who might.

I wouldn't put it past them, no matter what the law actually says!

[byronius]

24. Damn the Democracy! Full speed ahead, and over the edge!

Why hasn't Barack Obama proved he is actually human? HMMM?

And why hasn't he shaved his head to PROVE the 666 is NOT THERE? HMMMMMMM????

[struggle4progress]

30. OMG! I just heard that in 1968 William Ayers hired Kenyan-born Barry Muhammed Soetoro to murder

the young Barack Hussein Obama II in Indonesia and to steal his identity so he would be eligible to run for President! Why is the mainstream media covering this up?

[southernyankeebelle]

34. Of all people Clarence?

If the supreme court says its legal than the rightwing racists will say its Clarence Thomas denied us justice because he is black and supports Obama. You watch those nutjobs.

[crim son]

35. Bring it on, wingnuts!

Let's put this shit to rest once and for all.