Rational Security - Bush has hardly fought a "war on terror"

Teddy_Salad

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Mar-16-04 11:38 PM
Original message

Rational Security - Bush has hardly fought a "war on terror"

Rational Security

The problem isn't that George W. Bush hasn't done enough in the war on terrorism -- it's that he's hardly fought it at all.

More...
http://www.prospect.org/webfeatures/2004/03/yglesias-m-03-16.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

proud patriot

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Mar-17-04 12:30 AM
Response to Original message

1. wow .. great article

Welcome Underground :hi:

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Miss Authoritiva

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Mar-17-04 04:08 AM
Response to Original message

2. Stubborn to the point of incompetence

As Yglesias points out, the Bush Administration has changed nothing but its rhetoric since 9-11. The administration is overpopulated with leftover Cold Warriors hardwired to "a state-centric worldview incapable of really grasping global terrorism." I do not want to hear National Security Advisors saying things like "who could have imagined," as Condoleeza Rice did. These people are paid to "imagine."

What's so hard to grasp?

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

DU AdBot (1000+ posts)

Wed Apr 24th 2024, 05:08 AM
Response to Original message

Advertisements [?]

Top

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.