Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

All Guns, No Butter

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-10-08 07:20 AM
Original message
All Guns, No Butter
Edited on Sun Aug-10-08 07:21 AM by marmar
from In These Times:



News > August 8, 2008
All Guns, No Butter
By George Kenney



Now retired, Thomas P. Christie has served the U.S. government as an influential military analyst and manager. After holding senior positions at the Pentagon on and off from 1973, Christie worked as director of Operational Test and Evaluation from 2001-2005, the Pentagon’s chief weapons tester, the highest ranking civil service appointment in the Pentagon. Though largely unknown outside the Pentagon, Christie was a key figure in some of the biggest battles over military spending in recent years.

He regularly disproved contractors’ claims about new weapons systems, though some of the most unecessary have continued to be developed nonetheless. A master bureaucrat, tall, white-haired, soft-spoken, Christie rose through the ranks, providing leadership and institutional cover for an informal group of like-minded individuals concerned with Pentagon deficiencies across the board, from tactics and strategy to technology and economics.

More vocal than ever in retirement, Christie’s insights remain essential to discussions about how to control breakaway military spending.

The Pentagon spends enormously. The Defense budget for fiscal year ‘09 is $519 billion — $129 billion for personnel, $180 billion for operations and maintenance, $104 billion for procurement, $80 billion for research and development, $24 billion for military construction and $2 billion for management.

But that doesn’t come close to how much money eventually will be spent on the military. That doesn’t include the <$165 billion> supplemental . So you’re easily up to $700 billion in this coming fiscal year. And a large part of the budget is over in the Department of Energy — all the nuclear stuff. The Veteran’s Administration is carrying a burden associated with our veterans. ......(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.inthesetimes.com/article/3808/all_guns_no_butter/




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-10-08 07:48 AM
Response to Original message
1. I think the the 2009 military budget is $903,700,000,000.
$735,700,000,000 baseline and $168,000,000,000 to continue the occupations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hangingon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-10-08 08:53 AM
Response to Original message
2. Christie is a good man. He is one of Boyd's people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoesTo11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-10-08 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
3. If we spent the same proportion of GDP on military as
the rest of the world on average, we would probably have no deficit and billions and billions to invest in infrastructure and human services. In other words, we could spend like other countries do.

Wonder what the long term effects of our empire doing this this will be?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC