Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Election proved that Ohio should have a closed primary system

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Algorem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 10:24 AM
Original message
Election proved that Ohio should have a closed primary system
http://news.enquirer.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080309/EDIT02/803090359/1090
Your Voice


The day after the most momentous primary election in recent history, the Enquirer ran a headline that read, "Crossover voters spur shortage of ballots" (March 5). It seems that an unprecedented number of Democratic ballots were requested. Apparently in heavily Republican counties such as Clermont there was heavy voting in the Democratic primary.

Why was that? It doesn't stretch the imagination too much to think there were Republicans who voted for a Democratic candidate because they thought he/she would be easier to beat come November or because they couldn't stand the thought of one or the other occupying the White House.

What happened Election Day is the reason Ohio should have a closed primary system, and it should take more than a whim to change your party affiliation. The Democratic and Republican parties both have principles which are evident in their different platforms. People who strongly believe in either party's principles usually officially join that party - they choose to take a stand with that party. As such, when either the Democrats or Republicans are trying to decide who best represents their party as the nominee for the highest office in the land, they should have the privilege to do so without interference.
ADVERTISEMENT

One argument against a closed primary is that it doesn't allow independent voters a chance to participate in the primary process. Independent voters obviously don't align themselves with the principles of either party enough to be willing to join that party. Since independent voters obviously can vote in the general election I fail to see why they should be allowed to influence either party's primary process. They still have a voice. It's just not a voice within a party system of which they have chosen to opt out...


Raye Ann Sifri of Mack holds a doctorate in pharmacology from Ohio State University.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
roseBudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
1. The SW OH heavy GOP exurbs definitely have a track record of election tampering...
so we should not be surprised at the OH outcome.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
2. but obama says we should reach out to republicans. why the complaints? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 12:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC