Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NAFTA: Corporate Globalization: Standing at the End of the Road

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 09:33 AM
Original message
NAFTA: Corporate Globalization: Standing at the End of the Road

Standing at the end of Avenida Madero (Madero Avenue) on the last day of January 2008, a stone throw from the Zócalo or City Center of Mexico City, I am swept along in a sea of thousands of farmers and laborers, carrying signs and banners. Streaming from the historic statue of the Angel of Independence, symbolically setting fire to a decrepit tractor, one hundred and fifty thousand small farmers, teachers, workers, and neighborhood activists are marching to repeal the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), and end the illegal “dumping” by Cargill, ADM, and Monsanto of billions of dollars of taxpayer subsidized U.S. agricultural crops–beans, rice, sugar, powdered milk, soybeans, and genetically engineered corn–onto the Mexican market.

NAFTA, pushed through in Mexico, Canada, and the U.S. in 1994 over the opposition of the majority of North Americans, is literally driving Mexico’s thirty million small farmers and villagers off the land and into the slums of Mexico City, Guadalajara, Monterrey, Tijuana, Juarez, and other cities; or else, following the path of twelve million others before them, across the increasingly dangerous border into the United States to find work. Rural villages in Mexico have become literal economic ghost towns of women, children, and the elderly. In some municipalities, 80-90% of the men and boys are gone, increasingly joined by the young women.

A dark-skinned peasant woman, wearing her kitchen apron, approaches me. I stand out in the crowd, an obvious gringo with my Code Pink anti-war T-shirt and my Organic Consumers Association baseball cap. The farm woman patiently explains to me how NAFTA has broken up her family. Her two sons and her daughter, like millions of other jovenes (young people), she explains, desperate for a living wage, did not want to leave their community or abandon their families, but they had no choice. And now, with the militarized border, so-called illegal aliens, like her children, can no longer take the risk of coming back home to visit. Her sons and daughter, like most other immigrants, send back remesas (money) to help support their families. This twenty-four billion dollar annual lifeline is the only thing standing between Mexico¹s rural population and utter poverty.

Moving up behind the farmers, flanked by banners protesting the imminent sell-off of Mexico’s publicly owned electricity and oil industries, union workers and students fill the massive square in front of the National Palace. Mexican workers, whose minimum wage is 1/12 that of the U.S., are already suffering from high prices for electricity and gasoline. But once U.S. and European corporations take over the petroleum and electricity sectors, prices will inevitably skyrocket.

Passionate speakers from the podium call for a repeal of NAFTA and the restoration of food and energy sovereignty, but everyone knows that Big Business and Agribusiness call the shots in Mexico City, Ottawa, and Washington. Short of a miracle, rural and urban poverty will increase, as will the power and obscene wealth of the industrial agriculture, oil, and utilities multinationals. In July 2006 Mexicans launched an impressive though ultimately abortive ballot box revolution, turning out in droves for the anti-NAFTA presidential candidate, Manuel López Obrador, from the left-of-center PRD (Party of Democratic Revolution). Although Obrador won the popular vote, according to reliable exit polls and election experts, in a U.S.-style electronic vote theft, the elections were stolen, and Felipe Calderón, a pro-NAFTA corporatist was installed as President. As a Mexican activist friend reminds me today, we are at the end of the road for polite protest. Nothing short of a second Mexican (and American) revolution will save us.

Corporate globalization, savagely embodied by NAFTA
http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2008/02/12/6994/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
The Traveler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
1. K&R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Windy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
2. Jasmine, I hope you are reading this. Recommended! Thank you! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pberq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
3. "Corporate globalization, savagely embodied by NAFTA"
Says it all. Great article!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zodiak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
4. K&R
Because the only ones NAFTA benefits are the already rich
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ananda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
5. Free Trade (R) is just ..
.. SO FUCKING EVIL!

Pure evil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Helga Scow Stern Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
6. Is it true that both Obama and Clinton are voting for the next NAFTA "treaty"?
Someone posted that they were both planning to vote for the next NAFTA treaty with South America. Please advise, if anyone knows.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CRH Donating Member (671 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
7. 40% of Mexico's social funding is from exported oil. ...
After 2012 Mexico will no longer be an exporter. The Mexican society both rural and urban populations, are about to experience even worse than corporate globalization has brought them.

To the north, no wall can be built high enough, to prevent the economic migration. Immigration policy in the US will be a huge issue in the near future. It will be interesting to see what degree of militarization of the border, will be implemented.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Baby Snooks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Funding that may not be there in 2012
Few people realize the reality of what we are all facing. PEMEX, the nationalized oil company of Mexico, announced last summer that its major reserve is being depleted. It stated all of the reserves would be depleted in 5-7 years. We import between 20-25% of our oil from Mexico. Where will we get our oil? Where will Mexico get its oil?

Oil wars are a reality of the future. But then the "war on terror" is really nothing more than an oil war.

As for Mexico and NAFTA it was and is part of the agenda of oligarchy and has plunged Mexico into even further poverty. Now CAFTA. NAFTA + CAFTA = SHAFTA. And Bill Clinton didn't bat an eyelash.

Next comes the North American Union which Canada may not ratify. But the countries included in NAFTA and CAFTA will. As for Canada, well, no problem. We will simply discover weapons of mass destruction and plans by Queen Elizabeth to develop a secret nuclear weapons program and all sorts of human rights violations by the Canadian government and will simply invade and occupy Canada and probably hang Queen Elizabeth which will only leave Parliament to deal with in the planned dismantling of the Commonwealth. Not only will we have a "free market" in North America but we will have a "controlled free market" which serves the interests of a few. What oligarchy is all about. Not to mention all the oil Canada now has in the Arctic Circle.

Why will Canada pull out? Same reason Great Britian pulled out of the European Union. To protect their sovereignty.

Immigration reform will no longer be needed once the North American Union is ratified and established. There will be no borders. Just as there are no borders in Europe. Everyone will have one passport. And will be free to move about. Working here and going back there.

But illegal immigration served to establish a new worker class in this country. Lower wages, no labor law protections, and most of all a guaranteed worker base since they could not just work here and go back there. And Bill Clinton didn't bat an eyelash. He could have said, hey, why do we need new law? We already have a law. It needs to be enforced.

Good question. And of course Hillary Clinton promises immigration reform. Hers is probalby the Bushes' immigration reform. The North American Union.

Hope people think about these things in the remaining states before they vote for Hillary Clinton. She is part of the agenda as well. And it is not an agenda that serves the American people. Or the people of Mexico and Central America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlertLurker Donating Member (877 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Canada pull out of NAU?
I don't think so. What makes you think that OUR "elites" are any less corrupt or any more ethical than YOUR "elites?"

Ours sold us down the river, same as yours when they signed NAFTA - the same assholes are in power right now, and fer sure, they wouldn't bat an eyelash...

And "Chairman Mo" has a new agenda, now...


If US Multi-Nationals want Canada's oil, timber, fish, etc. they will get it - even if we the sheeple have to elect some new "elites" to give it to them...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CRH Donating Member (671 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Interesting Thoughts, and some good points ...

Personally I think the treaty ratification for the proposed North American Union will be a very hard sell. They won't be able to push this one through with the ease they rammed NAFTA down the throats of working class America. Time will tell on this one. The proposed Union is in reality, in its political infancy, with most people in the US totally unaware. This I believe will change.

The debate between open borders and a militarized border will soon begin as the northern migration gains pace. The seeds of opposition are already being planted by Lou Dobbs and others, with the political tug of war and fracturing of the Latino voting base soon to be realized, perhaps as soon as the general. In ways it will be shaped as a racial issue more than an economic, with pro globalization elites trying to control the dialog. Splitting of the democratic base will be a equalizing factor as the religious conservative far right's power begins to wane. I think the republican party and platform right now are beginning to evolve with new issues and change and consolidate, a slightly different base. As usual in the end, it will be divisive, pit the welfare of one group against the other, with a wealthy elite left in a win win situation.

For Mexico and Latin America, open borders and a North American Union can only be viewed as good with all the free trade agreements aligned against their sovereignty and economic health, and for the elite in the US the open borders represent continued control of cheap non union labor.

At any rate the politics of these issues are soon to happen with the pressure of the oil peak in Mexico, and the effects on their economy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CRH Donating Member (671 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. self delete, sorry, connection problems today and a resulting double post. n/t
Edited on Fri Feb-15-08 12:51 PM by CRH
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 02:55 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. now if Mexico would allow some private investment in Pemex...
they could modernize its crumbling infrastructure and also explore some incredible deep water reserves in the gulf

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aldo Donating Member (297 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
11. Kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
14. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC