Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

House to Consider Evangelical Resolution 888 by Rep. Randy Forbes (R-va) and 31 other RW nuts.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 11:34 AM
Original message
House to Consider Evangelical Resolution 888 by Rep. Randy Forbes (R-va) and 31 other RW nuts.
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/011408A.shtml

House Passes, Considers Evangelical Resolutions By Jason Leopold

A Republican congressman, who has spent the better part of the past two years on a mission to ensure Jesus Christ has a place in all aspects of federal government, has introduced a resolution to designate a week every year to honor the nation's "rich spiritual, and religious history."

House Resolution 888, sponsored by Congressman Randy Forbes (R-Virginia), is currently before a House committee and has 31 co-sponsors. It purports to be free from singling out a specific religion, yet contains dozens of proclamations with clear fundamentalist Christian overtones. Five pages of footnotes cite specific Bible passages, the Gospels, churches, and include Biblical references taken from historical monuments such as the Lincoln Memorial.

"This resolution, which purports to promote 'education on America's history of religious faith,' is packed with the same American history lies found on the Christian nationalist websites, and in the books of pseudo-historians like David Barton," Rodda wrote on the Talk2Action web site. "It lists a total of seventy-five 'Whereas,' leading up to four resolves, the third of which is particularly disturbing - that the U.S. House of Representatives 'rejects, in the strongest possible terms, any effort to remove, obscure, or purposely omit such history from our Nation's public buildings and educational resources,' a travesty of the highest magnitude, considering that most of the 'history' this resolve aims to promote in our public buildings and schools IS NOT REAL!"

Separately, Forbes has also introduced two bills, one that would protect the rights of lawmakers to express "their religious beliefs through public prayer by removing all establishment clause cases involving prayer by public officials from federal court jurisdiction to the jurisdiction of state courts." The other legislation Forbes introduced "would bar judges from awarding legal fees to groups that sue municipalities for violating the Constitution's ban on government establishment of religion."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Red Zelda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
1. Who votes for these crackpots?
I know. Crackpots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mz Pip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
2. Forbes needs to
educate himself on "America's history of religious faith" before he tries to introduce such legislation.

Doesn't the HOuse have better thenings to do with our tax dollars?

Perhaps this is a perfect example of why we need to have tax increases. If the American people want to send idiots to represent them then they should be willing to pay for the time these idiots waste once they get in office.


Mz Pip
:dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
3. Thank God Someone Is Finally Focusing On An Important Issue
Those who think issues such as the war, the economy, the crimes of the * admin should be given priority must be the spawn of the devil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
4. Have any of these ass-hats read the writings and statements of the founding fathers?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
5. The continual pissing on the Constitution..
Edited on Tue Jan-15-08 11:48 AM by Virginia Dare
and contempt for the founding principals of this country astounds me...:wow: Sometimes I think we'd be better off giving these people what they think they actually want and see how they like it. If we continue to allow these fuckwads to jam their religious beliefs down our throats than we get what we richly deserve, the CHRISTIAN TALIBAN.

There are VERY GOOD REASONS why this country was founded on a clear separation between church and state. Wake up and get a clue America!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
6. Sounds more like Evangelical Resolution 666
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benld74 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
7. NFW!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
8. yet another crock from our congress
:argh:

While we sit here sinking, they're making resolutions about praying on the taxpayer dime and reworking their gourmet dinner menus. :argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC