http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A48699-2003Jul25.htmlThe recall drive is the latest product of California's culture of anti-politics. At its core, this culture is built around a heightened distrust of centers of economic and political power. Although such distrust can be found throughout America's history, nowhere is it as intense and nowhere has it taken root with so many forms of direct democracy as in California.
Its origins go back to the second half of the 19th century, when California's economy and politics were dominated by the major railroads -- particularly the Union Pacific -- which were able, by buying off the legislature if necessary, to thwart attempts to create policies that would provide greater rights and benefits to workers and small business owners. Reformers felt that playing by the rules was useless, as the rules were stacked against the average Californian. So reformers, whom we now call Progressives, led by then-Gov. Hiram Johnson, enacted a series of procedures that allowed citizens to go around the existing decision-making process to make policy directly.
<snip>
But if the recall is successful there is one potential -- and significant -- danger: It could become an institutionalized and frequently used weapon. We've seen this happen before. Until the 1970s, the direct initiative was rarely used. It was in effect a safety valve voters could use if the political establishment consistently thwarted the popular will. But since the passage of Proposition 13, the initiative has become a more and more integral part of California policymaking.
The same could occur following a successful recall. The Democrats and their allies are unlikely to miss the lessons of 2003. The recall will be added as another weapon of political combat. Elected officials will increasingly fear taking actions that create short-term pain for long-term gain. Who would be willing to risk being thrown out of office for taking unpopular action, even if it's temporary?