Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

THOMAS L. FRIEDMAN: Playing the Hand We’ve Dealt

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
kevinmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-19-07 08:40 PM
Original message
THOMAS L. FRIEDMAN: Playing the Hand We’ve Dealt
Last week, President Bush appointed a “war czar,” Lt. Gen. Douglas Lute, to oversee everything we’re doing in Iraq and Afghanistan — which raises the question: Who was doing this job up to now? The answer, amazingly, is no one. We’re like a fine restaurant that has decided five years after it’s opened — and has lost most of its customers — that it might be good to hire a head chef. Better late than never. General Lute comes advertised as smart and tough. Good. I hope his first memo to the president starts like this:

Mr. President, if you look around the region, all those we’ve tried to isolate — Iran, Hamas, Hezbollah, the Iraqi insurgents and the Taliban — are stronger today than they were two years ago. We have to reassess our strategy, beginning by facing up to the fact that we’ve fundamentally altered the geopolitical landscape in the Middle East.

We brought down the hard walls that surrounded Iran by destroying Iran’s two archenemies — the Taliban in Afghanistan and Saddam’s regime in Iraq. As a result, we are dealing today with an emboldened, resurgent Iran, which has taken advantage of our good works to expand its economic, cultural, religious and geopolitical influence into Persian-speaking western Afghanistan and into Shiite Iraq.

With Saddam gone, none of the Arab states are strong enough to balance Iran. They are all either too weak or too dysfunctional. This means we have two choices. We can be the regional power balancing Iran, which will require keeping thousands of troops in the area indefinitely. Or we have to engage Tehran in a high-level dialogue, in which we focus on our mutual interests in stabilizing Afghanistan and Iraq. You have to choose, Mr. President: I can’t do my job if you don’t face the fact that our wars in Iraq and Afghanistan — and our energy gluttony — have empowered Iran......

http://freedemocracy.blogspot.com/2007/05/thomas-l-friedman-playing-hand-weve.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-19-07 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. When is the Last Time Iran Invaded Anyone?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-20-07 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #1
18. Early 1800s, IIRC.
Maybe late 1700s. Russia. Got their asses kicked, which just showed what everybody knew: it was so weak that, like Belize and Turks and Caicos, it dare not invade anyone.

And that, my friend, is the spanner in the works. It's possible for a quiet, gentle person to be docile and friendly, but you'll never know until you've taken the gun away from his head and he has one to point at you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-19-07 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. Perhaps this explains Senator Clinton's and Senator
McCain's positions---

MCCain---We are going to be in Iraq a long time.


Senator Clinton---I will end the war but keep a small contingent
of troops there.

??????????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-19-07 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
3. So, Friedman's been relegated to a blog, rather than the NYT. Incremental changes, anyone?
:-) MKJ

P.S. Welcome to the real world Mr. Friedman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roseBudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-19-07 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. He's still Times Select, some bloggers are just violating the Select part
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-19-07 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Thanks for the clarification.
:-) MKJ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roseBudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-19-07 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Times went after papers who had had the select columnists on their web versions prior to Select
and made them stop putting the columns online. Some papers never did have the syndicated columnists on their web versions.

I imagine the Times sees no point in going after blogs that have no advertising. I can't imagine Daily Kos getting away with it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-19-07 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. .
Agreed and :spray: MKJ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-19-07 08:58 PM
Response to Original message
4. The Mustache In Search of a Brain strikes again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Bacon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-20-07 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #4
19. Tommy is pouting because he isn't gonna be able to play War Czar!
I hope I live to see the day when Tommy and his fellow Press Whores are in the dock before the World Court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pretzel4gore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-19-07 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
5. mr president, it's us mediawhores who created you
and the mess yall are in. get ridda us, mr President, however you can! If you must, send us in a pinstriped army, to iraq, and PAY the insurgents for every pair of eyes (genetic material) they deliver to your reg army guys....after killing off 100 thousand of us MEDIAWHORES then you gotta get busy on the next 100k, but meanwhile YOU MUST use police to round up the rightwing media political establishment in the US, Britain, and the rest of the west- leave not one rightwinger in power in newsmedia, not even ONE, Mr Bush, or you'll suffer for it! And humanity will suffer with you (not that humanity matters, sir, but the optics would do you proud to mention it)
this is tom friedman, and i approve this message, mr president
(geez this is good dope- the truth, oh how i love da trut!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-19-07 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
6. What? No new demarcation of another Freidman unit?
I am so disappointed. I was sure the next six months would be critical.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-19-07 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
8. Well, hey, for once he is right.
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wellst0nev0ter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-19-07 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Yeah, But He's Still The Last Horse That Crosses The Finish Line
If the Bush regime has taught me anything, it has taught me to identify all the worthless hacks who are actually paid to peddle their garbage. I can get more prescient substance reading a random DU thread than by reading these so-called "experts"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-19-07 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Truth is where you find it.
I am as willing to bash Friedman as anyone, but if you shit on the truth because of who says it, you are still shitting on the truth. When someone like Friedman manages to get a clue, that needs to be encouraged. The more mainstream media whores we have talking about dialog, the less chance we have of getting into another stupid war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-19-07 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Thanks for saying that , Bemildred.

the truth is the truth--matter who speaks it.

I have believed the reason we cannot get out of Iraq
is we empowered Iran and this throws a monkeywrench in the
whole Middle East.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-20-07 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #13
20. Well, apparently we are going to talk to Iran now.
It has dawned on our "leaders" that the US and Iran have a common interest in a stable, non-jihadi-breeding Iraq. I think it is too late to un-throw the monkey wrench, but you have to do what you can.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billbuckhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-19-07 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. This flat earth worshipping whore was such a cheerleader for iraq&globalization
Edited on Sat May-19-07 10:27 PM by billbuckhead
I just can't be objective about him anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-20-07 07:32 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. Yeah, I know, I know. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Bacon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-19-07 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
16. How many more Friedman Units do the troops have to suffer?
How many more FU's Tommy?

How many more times will you say give us 6 more months you flat headed fool?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC