Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

US answer to global warming: smoke and giant space mirrors

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Briar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-27-07 04:25 AM
Original message
US answer to global warming: smoke and giant space mirrors
US answer to global warming: smoke and giant space mirrors


Washington urges scientists to develop ways to reflect sunlight as 'insurance'

David Adam, environment correspondent

The US government wants the world's scientists to develop technology to block sunlight as a last-ditch way to halt global warming, the Guardian has learned. It says research into techniques such as giant mirrors in space or reflective dust pumped into the atmosphere would be "important insurance" against rising emissions, and has lobbied for such a strategy to be recommended by a major UN report on climate change, the first part of which will be published on Friday.

The US has also attempted to steer the UN report, prepared by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), away from conclusions that would support a new worldwide climate treaty based on binding targets to reduce emissions - as sought by Tony Blair. It has demanded a draft of the report be changed to emphasise the benefits of voluntary agreements and to include criticisms of the Kyoto Protocol, the existing treaty which the US administration opposes.

The final IPCC report, written by experts from across the world, will underpin international negotiations to devise a new emissions treaty to succeed Kyoto, the first phase of which expires in 2012. World governments were given a draft of the report last year and invited to comment.

The US response, a copy of which has been obtained by the Guardian, says the idea of interfering with sunlight should be included in the summary for policymakers, the prominent chapter at the front of each IPCC report. It says: "Modifying solar radiance may be an important strategy if mitigation of emissions fails. Doing the R&D to estimate the consequences of applying such a strategy is important insurance that should be taken out. This is a very important possibility that should be considered."

http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,,1999966,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-27-07 04:42 AM
Response to Original message
1. Bush corporatism could care less about global warming
It's all about the fast buck to them and the future be damned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-27-07 04:52 AM
Response to Original message
2. maybe some smoke from droping an atomic bomb on Iran would help.. thats the Ticket..!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheMadMonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-27-07 05:30 AM
Response to Original message
3. It's not as silly an idea as it seems.
Don't get me wrong, curbing emissions has to be the ultimate long term solutions.

However, even if the energy infrastructure of the world were to become totally carbon free overnight, it will still take decades to recover.

Solar mirrors and/or reflective particulates int the atmosphere hold the potential to give near instant relief. Presuming of course we have the wherewithal to get them into place.

Furthermore, solar mirrors could be used to create hot and cold poles at judicious locations which would allow us to steer storms such as Katrina away from populated areas, or rob them of their strength. And in the longer term as we refine our control, it would become possible to steer rainfall (in just the right quantities) to the places where it is needed.

And while such systems, in the wrong hands, could be used to wreak considerable havoc, their fragility all but negates such risks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
C_U_L8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-27-07 06:14 AM
Response to Original message
4. Nothing a little nuclear winter won't solve
they just might be that stupid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC