Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Virginia Vs. "Scuzzball Reporters" (That's Me!)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
deadparrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-26-07 08:43 PM
Original message
Virginia Vs. "Scuzzball Reporters" (That's Me!)
Virginia state Sen. Ken Cuccinelli, a Republican from Fairfax County, is one of the press corps' favorite lawmakers in Richmond. He's no great statesman, but he's got a penchant for taking the outrages of daily life and concocting some way to write new laws about them.

Lately, Cuccinelli is bothered by "scuzzball reporters out there who don't have a shred of human decency to give a flying rat's tail about the condition or feelings or circumstances of families" who've suffered some tragedy. Cuccinelli is offended by the sight of press hacks descending on citizens who've lost a loved one in some crime, fire or accident, so he's decided it should be illegal for reporters--or anyone else, for that matter-- to visit such families.

His Senate Bill 1120 would deem criminal anyone who enters onto someone's private property within a week after the owner's family "suffered a substantial personal, physical, mental, or emotional loss, injury, or trauma."

The senator says this is necessary to stop scuzzball reporters from "bugging people" for a "juicy quote."

I'm one of those scuzzball reporters.

http://blog.washingtonpost.com/rawfisher/2007/01/virginia_vs_scuzzball_reporter.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Little Wing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-26-07 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. If the people want to make a statement, then let them make it
otherwise leave them the fuck alone.

Pretty simple, eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
silverweb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-26-07 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. Good.
"His Senate Bill 1120 would deem criminal anyone who enters onto someone's private property within a week after the owner's family "suffered a substantial personal, physical, mental, or emotional loss, injury, or trauma."

Simple human decency calls for that minimal consideration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solo_in_MD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-26-07 11:33 PM
Response to Original message
3. Its as good a reason as any for automated sprinkers
preferably a system with an additivie capability for fertilizer or insecticide. Wait until they gather and then douse them all, add phosphates and Malithion to taste. Yes I'm feeling snarky, and I depise the feeding frenzies of the MSM. However, the bill is inane.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC