Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

LAT editorial: Is any phone call off-limits?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-12-06 10:05 AM
Original message
LAT editorial: Is any phone call off-limits?
EDITORIALS
Is any phone call off-limits?
Latest NSA revelations show that the White House can't be trusted to draw the line on liberties.
May 12, 2006

GEN. MICHAEL V. HAYDEN, President Bush's nominee to head the Central Intelligence Agency, may want to call off his charm offensive with members of Congress. The Air Force general isn't likely to make much headway after the revelation that the National Security Agency, which he used to head, not only eavesdropped on telephone conversations and e-mail messages of Americans suspected of ties with foreign terrorists, it also induced telephone companies to turn over the records of billions — that's with a "b" — of domestic calls.

On Thursday, USA Today reported that after 9/11, the NSA asked telecommunications companies to turn over the "call-detail" records of millions of customers. The records — essentially a list of phone numbers — reportedly have been used by the agency to identify patterns that would help identify terrorists. The newspaper said that the data turned over by AT&T, Verizon and BellSouth did not include customers' names or personal information. But it would not be hard for the agency to connect those dots.

Until now, the Bush administration's defense of its warrantless eavesdropping program has centered on two assertions: first, that the program targets only international phone conversations and e-mails; and second, that it involves a relatively small number of Americans linked to foreign terrorists. Now it appears that this program is a vast dragnet that ensnares the innocent as well as the (possibly) guilty. The administration's explanations are no longer operative, to use a phrase its agents will understand....

***

Of course, the administration can be expected to argue that almost anything is permitted under its expansive notions of the president's powers in the war on terrorism — and, at the same time, that this president has always exercised those powers judiciously....In other words: Trust us. But by now no one in (or out of) Congress should have any faith in the administration's assurances about either its actions or its intentions under this program. As another president once observed: Trust, but verify. Congress needs to fill in the blanks.

http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-ed-nsa12may12,0,5890482.story?coll=la-home-commentary
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC