Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Impeachment Nonsense By Charles Krauthammer

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
jbfam4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 01:53 PM
Original message
Impeachment Nonsense By Charles Krauthammer
Impeachment Nonsense

By Charles Krauthammer
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/12/22/AR2005122201102.html?nav=hcmodule
Friday, December 23, 2005; Page A21



Administration critics, political and media, charge that by ordering surveillance on communications of suspected al Qaeda agents in the United States, the president clearly violated the law. Some even suggest that Bush has thereby so trampled the Constitution that impeachment should now be considered. (Barbara Boxer, Jonathan Alter, John Dean and various luminaries of the left have already begun floating the idea.) The braying herds have already concluded, Tenet-like, that the president's actions were slam-dunk illegal. It takes a superior mix of partisanship, animus and ignorance to say that.



Presidents always jealously guard executive authority. And Congress always wants to challenge the scope of that authority. This tug of war is a bipartisan and constant feature of the American system of separation of powers. President Bush's circumvention of FISA is a classic separation-of-powers dispute in the area in which these powers are most in dispute -- war powers.

Consider the War Powers Resolution passed over Richard Nixon's veto in 1973. It restricts, with very specific timetables, the president's authority to use force. Every president since Nixon, Democrat and Republican, has regarded himself not bound by this law, declaring it an unconstitutional invasion of his authority as commander in chief.

Nor will it do to argue that the Clinton administration ultimately accepted the strictures of the FISA law after a revision was passed. So what? For the past three decades, presidents have adhered to the War Powers Resolution for reasons of prudence, to avoid a constitutional fight with Congress. But they all maintained the inherent illegitimacy of the law and the right to ignore it. Similarly, Clinton's acquiescence to FISA in no way binds future executives to renounce Clinton's claim of "inherent authority" to conduct warrantless searches for purposes of foreign intelligence.


Contrary to the administration, I also believe that as a matter of political prudence and comity with Congress, Bush should have tried to get the law changed rather than circumvent it. This was an error of political judgment. But that does not make it a crime. And only the most brazen and reckless partisan could pretend it is anything approaching a high crime and misdemeanor.

letters@ch arleskrauthammer.com


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BikeWriter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. It's the Constitution, read it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
november3rd Donating Member (653 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Like all the top-of-the-line Fox commentators,
Like all the top-of-the-line Fox commentators, he's the toilet paper to the neo-cons' "poopers".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BikeWriter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Cheap asswipe at that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sojourner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
2. this man is a neocon asswipe, always was. hate him. hate what he writes.
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EST Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
3. Dr. K. again demonstrates his proud grasp
of his own pseudo-intellectualism. We are a nation of laws, not political expediency. I had thought the constitution and bill of rights so clear and unambiguous that an understanding of at least the basic elements was available to even the most jaded or mentally lazy.
The evidence for brain fever mounts.
Sometimes I am thoroughly ashamed of being related to people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ArbustoBuster Donating Member (956 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
4. Krauthammer's statement makes no sense.
How does it not rise to the level of a high crime and misdemeanor? A parking ticket is a misdemeanor. Is this moron saying that breaking the Constitution and several important laws, not to mention going to Congress to ask for war powers inside the US and being rejected (and then using those war powers, illegally, anyway) is less illegal than a parking ticket?

Krauthammer is the worst kind of journalistic whore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alarimer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. I wonder what he'd say if Clinton did this
What he actually did was so minor (if in fact it was even a crime, which I doubt) but what Bush has done is cause a Constitutional crisis. He is a criminal- he admitted to breaking the law. He thinks he is above the law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
8. Fuck that Idiot,
krauthammer is an idiot from way back..he has no street cred.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC