Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

LAT: Shooting Illustrates Air Safety Conflict

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Catchawave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-12-05 10:30 AM
Original message
LAT: Shooting Illustrates Air Safety Conflict
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-marshals9dec09,1,6576951.story?coll=la-headlines-nation

<snip>
Many security and law enforcement experts said Thursday that the shooting may have been an unfortunate byproduct of the porous nature of the current system for screening airline passengers.

"Air marshals have zero trust in the screeners," said one marshal who requested anonymity. Because Homeland Security policy forbids marshals from speaking out about their job or criticizing the service, no marshals would speak for attribution. One air marshal is suing Homeland Security over the policy.

I.C. Smith, a retired FBI agent and national security expert, said: "It is clear these marshals know that these security checkpoints are not fail-safe. You read about reports all the time of stuff slipping through. They have to really expect the worst. And I think that is probably what happened in this case."

DeFazio said the shooting should prompt reassessment of screening procedures and equipment that he called outdated.

"We're running passenger checkpoints for carry-on bags that are incapable of finding plastic explosives," DeFazio said by telephone from an airport where he was waiting for a flight. "The kind of X-rays they're using were thrown out of the Capitol years ago because they weren't able to catch anything.

"We have technologies — walk-through portals — but the administration doesn't want to spend the money to buy it," he said.

<snip>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-12-05 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. more police state bs...
flying has damn near become intolerable, and all they keep saying is more 'security'. :grr:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catchawave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-12-05 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Intolerable for who?
The "terra-ists" :shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-12-05 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. for the passengers
I really hate flying since we became the land of insecurity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catchawave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-12-05 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I'm sorry :(
Guess I'm between a rock and hard place? M'son's a Fed and I fly'a'lot. I feel very safe :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 05:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC