Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Worst Speech of Bush's Presidency

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
liberalpragmatist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-12-05 03:40 PM
Original message
The Worst Speech of Bush's Presidency
Edited on Sat Nov-12-05 03:48 PM by liberalpragmatist
http://www.tnr.com/doc.mhtml?i=w051107&s=kusnet111205

THE WORST SPEECH OF BUSH'S PRESIDENCY.
Attack Mode
by David Kusnet

For speechwriters drafting a presidential address for a patriotic holiday such as Independence Day, Memorial Day, or Veterans Day, there are three rules: Don't be wordy; don't be wonky; and, most important, don't be partisan. In his Veterans Day remarks today at the Tobyhanna Army Depot near Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania, President Bush and his staff broke all three rules, producing a strident speech that went on for almost 50 minutes, included a lengthy comparison of "Islamic radicalism" and "the ideology of communism," and concluded by attacking "some Democrats," while taking an implicit shot at "my opponent during the last election." It may have been the worst speech of his presidency.

<snip>

Moreover, Veterans Day is certainly not the venue for a president to attack the opposition party or single out a defeated opponent, as Bush did today. Towards the end of his speech, Bush declared, "While it's perfectly legitimate to criticize my decision or the conduct of the war, it is deeply irresponsible to rewrite the history of how that war began." He criticized "some Democrats and antiwar critics" for "claiming we manipulated the intelligence and misled the American people about why we went to war." Then he did something that no president in recent memory has done: He took what could be read as an implicit shot at the man he defeated, explaining, "Many of these critics supported my opponent during the last election, who explained his position to support the resolution in Congress this way." Bush then quoted Kerry's statement defending his vote to authorize the use of force in Iraq--essentially holding Kerry up for ridicule, since Kerry is now a war critic. Do you remember Clinton criticizing Bob Dole in 1997; or Reagan criticizing Walter Mondale in 1985; or even Nixon criticizing George McGovern in 1973? Of course not--second-term presidents tend to co-opt, not condemn, defeated opponents.

Bush's speech also adopted two of Nixon's smarmiest rhetorical techniques: attacking the nameless but nefarious "some," just as Nixon used to disagree with "some who say"; and lumping together very different people--the villainous "some Democrats," the "antiwar critics" who could be anyone from Russ Feingold to Ramsey Clark, and, finally, Kerry himself.

<snip>

This was a speech that presented Bush's case implausibly and inappropriately. It's hard for a president to sound unpresidential on a patriotic holiday, but Bush achieved that dubious distinction today.

***

Login required. You can log in under the ID dailykos and the password dailykos
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DavidDvorkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-12-05 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. Log in where?
Could you add a link, please?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalpragmatist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-12-05 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Whoops, sorry
Will update
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-12-05 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. And, he lied, again and again and again ....
Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
louis-t Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-12-05 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
4. "my opponent during the last election"?
This is a paranoid man who is fearful he will be found out. He is a disgrace. He knows the election was stolen and is still trying to justify himself in his own mind. Still fighting the battle of the election. He knows he lost.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neil Lisst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-12-05 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
5. It was a real stinker of a speech.
I thought it was terrible. I made myself listen to it, just like I do most of these "important" speeches he makes. I thought it reflected the new influence of Karen Hughes and waning influence of Rove.

Also, it sounded like Bush is adding more of his own thinking.

The whole "well John Kerry voted for it" line of thought isn't going to sell. Nor is the "they had the same intel we did" bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MarianJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-12-05 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
6. But WAIT!
Edited on Sat Nov-12-05 04:56 PM by MarianJack
Didn't freeperville call it bush's "Gettysburg Address"?

If they aren't reliable political barometers than who is? :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-05 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
7. I say 'good'.
Let him keep babbling on. I hope his speeches become longer and longer. Soon, his poor victims will be sitting there, asleep from Bush's droning voice, their butts sore because he won't ever shut up.

Next, hit the TV networks. Make sure Bush defends his kids, attacks local Dem's, and throw in Chirac and Schröeder for good measure. Be certain that Bush has covered all his bases.

Make sure his jaw swivels like crazy, and don't forget big blotches on his face from ultimate stress.

I won't be tuning in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC