http://editorandpublisher.com/eandp/columns/pressingissues_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1000847595&imw=Y--Read the exchange in the article, not excerpted here.
March 22, 2005) -- Late last week, a group of top journalists conducted a valuable symposium at the National Press Club in Washington, D.C., under the title, “The Seduction of Secrecy.” On hand were Geneva Overholser, Bill Kovach, Tom Curley, Alex Jones, Lucy Dalglish, Jack Nelson, and others -- a stellar group. A few excerpts from the transcript have appeared elsewhere.
Unnoticed was one particularly fascinating exchange between Jack Shafer, media critic for Slate, and Philip Taubman, Washington bureau chief for The New York Times. It's wonderful because rather that speaking generally, it zeroed in on one particular example of anonymous sourcing -- and the complainer found himself (perhaps by surprise) taking his case directly to the editor who approved the sourcing.
It began with Tom Rosenstiel citing his Project for Excellence in Journalism's recent "State of the Media" report, which found that 7% of all stories studied in 16 newspapers contained anonymous sources. This actually represented a 29% decrease since last year, he said.
Ken Paulson, editor of USA Today, then described his paper's fairly tough policy on using unnamed sources. Overholser, the moderator, then asked Taubman what he thought about all off this.
........