Negroponte: Unfit to Lead (the new DNI: from The Nation)

[baby_bear]

We should all contact our senators and say we want the 1997 CIA inspector general's report released in full (rather than in a "heavily redacted" form; see below); but especially those who have senators on the Intelligence Committee:

Pat Roberts, Kansas;John D. Rockefeller IV,West Virginia;
Orrin G. Hatch, Utah; Carl Levin, Michigan;
Mike Dewine, Ohio Dianne Feinstein, California
Christopher S. Bond, Missouri; Ron Wyden, Oregon;
Trent Lott, Mississippi; Evan Bayh, Indiana;
Olympia J. Snowe, Maine; Barbara A. Mikulski, Maryland;
Chuck Hagel, Nebraska; Jon S. Corzine, New Jersey;
Saxby Chambliss, Georgia

http://www.thenation.com/doc.mhtml?i=20050314&s=corn
<snip>
The ultimate goal of the DNI is to guarantee that the President and other policy-makers receive unvarnished and valuable information. Yet there is evidence that Negroponte, when he was Ronald Reagan's ambassador to Honduras in the 1980s, suppressed intelligence that was politically inconvenient. At the time, the Reagan Administration was relying on the Honduran government and military in its not-too-secret war against the Sandinistas in Nicaragua. After Congress ended aid to the anti-Sandinista contras, the Reagan Administration essentially bribed the Honduran government into providing further assistance to the contras in what was arguably an illegal deal. (For helping the contras, the Hondurans received economic aid that had been withheld and military supplies.) Throughout this episode, Negroponte acted as the boss of the contra operations in Honduras, and he participated in the covert quid pro quo arrangement. According to a 1997 CIA inspector general's report, he also smothered reports on human rights abuses committed by the Honduran military.

Since the early 1980s, Negroponte has denied that his partners in Honduras perpetuated deliberate and extensive human rights abuses. Yet this CIA report concluded, "The Honduran military committed hundreds of human rights abuses since 1980, many of which were politically motivated and officially sanctioned." According to the report, the US-backed Honduran army was linked to "death squad activities." The report quoted an official in Negroponte's embassy saying that "the embassy country team in Honduras wanted reports on subjects such as to be benign" because such reporting "would reflect negatively on Honduras and not be beneficial in carrying out US policy." The heavily redacted CIA report said that in one case the embassy discouraged reporting on a particular human rights matter because of Negroponte's concern that it would "create human rights problems for Honduras." A groundbreaking 1995 Baltimore Sun series noted, "A comparison of the annual human rights reports prepared while Negroponte was ambassador with the facts as they were then known shows Congress was deliberately misled." The newspaper reported, "Time and again...Negroponte was confronted with evidence that a Honduran army intelligence unit, trained by the CIA, was stalking, kidnapping, torturing and killing suspected subversives." None of this made it into State Department reports.
...
Given the task he is being handed now, his time in Honduras--and his two decades of denial--warrant close scrutiny. (The Democrats should call for a full declassification of the 1997 CIA report.)
</snip>

I agree, and will be writing today.

b_b