Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush Prepares for Changes in Programs and Cabinet (the Cheney Tax Plan)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 08:07 PM
Original message
Bush Prepares for Changes in Programs and Cabinet (the Cheney Tax Plan)
snip>
A Republican adviser to the White House said there were two distinct strains of thinking within the administration about tax simplification.

One group, which the adviser said included Vice President Dick Cheney, supports throwing out the existing tax system and replacing it with a new one, built around the idea of exempting savings and investment from taxation and effectively levying a tax only on consumption. The new system, in this view, could be either a national sales tax or a single-rate flat income tax that as a practical matter only applies to income that people do not save or invest.

The other group, which the adviser said includes Treasury Secretary John Snow and Andrew H. Card Jr., the White House chief of staff, prefers an approach styled after what President Ronald Reagan and Congress did to reshape the tax code in 1986. They want to keep in place the progressive income tax structure, but to reduce rates and offset the foregone revenue by closing loopholes, cutting out special interest tax breaks and eliminating most deductions except those for home mortgage interest and charitable giving.

"That's the debate," said the adviser, who spoke on the condition of anonymity so he would not run afoul of the White House, which prefers to announce policy decisions only after internal differences have been ironed out.

There are similar differences within the administration on how to cover costs of shifting to a system in which workers can invest a part of their Social Security payroll taxes in private retirement accounts.

http://nytimes.com/2004/11/07/politics/07term.html

It's hard to believe that just last year we argued about whether all or just part of Bush's tax cuts should be rolled back. Good times!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. time for dick to cover his earnings from Halliburton
and make sure all his cronies get the payback they paid for during the elections. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
creeksneakers2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
2. In other words
They are planning to dump the entire tax burden on the working and middle classes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cubsfan forever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. To the working and middle class folks
who voted for b/c: "Hungry? Eat your bumper-stickers!"

Professor 2
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theHandpuppet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Bingo!
And yet a goodly portion of the 60 mil fools who voted for Tweedledumb and Tweedledick are the very people who are going to get screwed over. It's Malice in Wonderland time, folks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
durablend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. PRAISE THE LORD!
ALL (red states) HAIL GOD W BUSH!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
teryang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 10:50 PM
Response to Original message
4. Supermen do not suffer the shackles of taxation
That is only for weaklings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 10:54 PM
Response to Original message
5. I think we're about to be Cheneyed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thecrow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 01:17 AM
Response to Original message
8. Not much of a choice is it?
On the one hand the middle class gets f'ed.
On the other hand.... oh wait... there is no other hand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. The con is begun with this "ownership society" crap
Americans are easy to persuade. I remember seeing stats about a huge percentage of the public actually believing they fell into the catagory of "rich" whenever mention was made of rolling back tax cuts on the "rich". 20% or more believed they were in the top 2%.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snippy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
10. I have seen several Tax Cut Monkeys and Reich Wingers say that
the plan is to create a back door consumption tax on only wages and salaries. All investment income will be nontaxable and unlimited deductions will be allowed for contributions to investment accounts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
against all enemies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
11. After they go bankrupt, will Bush supporters still vote Repub?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Yes!
snip> On Sept. 10, 2001, Cary Leslie was earning about $55,000 a year. On Sept. 12, the decline began. No one was flying. No one was renting cars. Down went the commissions he gets when customers sign up for insurance coverage. ''Maybe $35,000," Cary Leslie said of what he earns now, and that includes income from a second job he took a year ago, delivering pizzas Friday and Saturday nights.

Forty hours a week at the car-rental counter, 12 hours a week running pizzas, the pinch of gasoline at $2 a gallon, savings drained, the realization that he and his wife are ''kind of the working poor" -- and still it was moral concerns, rather than economic ones, that guided both of them on Election Day.

''I don't blame President Bush for anything that's happened with my income," Cary Leslie said. Rather, he looks at Bush as someone who believes in ''personal responsibility," which Cary Leslie believes in as well.

http://www.boston.com/news/politics/president/bush/articles/2004/11/07/for_evangelical_family_bushs_victory_due_to_values_prayer?pg=2
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AG78 Donating Member (840 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. Yes
As long as there's a threat of gay marriage and God being killed.

They will vote Republican, see the Hollywood liberal elite get a tax cut, get pissed, and vote Republican again because they'll tell them that the Hollywood liberal elite controls the country. And then the Hollywood liberal elite will get another tax cut. Bush supporters will vote Republican again because they're pissed, and the Hollywood liberal elite will get another tax cut. That cycle will continue endlessly.

The Culture War...catch it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CBHagman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
14. NO CHENEY CONSUMPTION TAX
This ought to go over like a lead balloon with retailers and the workers, but we have to start hammering it this very week. I'll try to dig out Cheney's office number and contacts this week and post them. I may even go over to the whoreson's housing and start protesting.

Anyway, we have yet another glimpse into the depravity of Dick Cheney. His cardiologist cannot save him from the essential sickness of his soul.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
15. Cox News Service has similar coverage (aren't they very conservative?)
thanks to question everything for finding this one

Bush's tax plan may aid owners, not earners
Aim is promoting 'ownership' society; critics say it may shift burden off wealthy.

By MARILYN GEEWAX
Cox News Service


WASHINGTON – President George W. Bush says a dramatic overhaul of the tax code is a top priority of his second- term agenda. Though its details are hazy, the plan already is raising questions about fairness and affordability.

Bush has long made it clear he wants to restructure the tax system to promote an "ownership society" that encourages millions of average Americans to own property and financial securities.

"I believe strongly in ownership, because I know if you own something, you have a vital stake in the future of the United States of America," Bush said in a typical campaign comment as he traveled in Michigan last August.

That vision will play out in the tax code with reforms that further reduce taxes on dividends, interest payments and capital gains, said Stephen Moore, founder of the conservative Club for Growth and author of a new book, "Bullish On Bush: How George Bush's Ownership Society Will Make America Stronger."

http://www.ocregister.com/ocr/2004/11/07/sections/business/your_money/article_302357.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IronLionZion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-04 11:03 PM
Response to Original message
16. This would help people like George Soros
:wtf:

Some people make all their income from investments....and make a lot of it! Why shouldn't they get taxed too?

I'm going to get flamed for this, but I would support a tax on consumption because then rich people don't escape as easily. Everyone who buys stuff gets taxed. And it's transparent so it's harder or even impossible to cheat.

But I bet you Cheney will find a way to screw us. I've heard of people in the UK declaring themselves a small business (like timber :P) to avoid their national sales tax.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uncertainty1999 Donating Member (223 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 12:31 AM
Response to Original message
17. Alternative minimum tax = elephant in the room
The Dems should go after AMT aggressively (AMT was supposed to prevent millionaires from escaping taxation via loopholes, but is starting to snare upper middle class families in it - it prevents them from taking typical deductions. AMT is targeting lower and lower income levels each year, so that in some relatively short number of years, something outrageous like 50-90% of us will pay AMT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC